TRUMP TRIAL MEGATHREAD

[Steve Ramone]

34 felony counts for paying a porn star to keep her whore mouth shut. That's not election interference you dunce?

Have you been watching anything about this trial? You seem very confused. You know they can't just make up laws to charge people they don't like right?

 

[Guest]

You know what I notice about you? When you’re getting piled on you sulk and disappear, and come back and beg for truces and ask people to stop being mean to you. And then the minute you think people are piling on me or Jenna you get this ego like you can join in. You’re still a fat tittied cummy pants child killer, stupid.

It’s okay sue, I work with [URL='https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows']windows[/URL] too.

Heheheheheheh

 

[Guest]

Have you been watching anything about this trial? You seem very confused. You know they can't just make up laws to charge people they don't like right?

Is this cutting edge satire to troll? You know that’s pretty much all the law does right?

 

[chocolatehellhole]

Have you been watching anything about this trial? You seem very confused. You know they can't just make up laws to charge people they don't like right?

They turned a reach of a misdemeanor into 34 felony counts. Do you know what each of the 34 counts are? What's the statute of limitations in NY? Did Bragg campaign on charging Trump? You are dumber than @Sue Lightning

 

[BenDovid]

34 felony counts for

Falsifying business records to conceal a secondary crime.

 

[Suetonius]

They turned a reach of a misdemeanor into 34 felony counts.

Fucking lol the reach is the felony if anything. It is absolutely indisputable he fudged the checks. The alternative explanation is quite literally that Trump had no idea Cohen paid Daniels off and Trump just signed these checks without even asking what it was for. “Sure, legal work, even though he’s done no legal work in some of these months”

Do you know what each of the 34 counts are?

The ledgers vouchers and checks. 12 of each making 36. But 2 got lost in the mail, so it’s only 34.

Did Bragg campaign on charging Trump?

Yes but DA’s can’t will crimes into existence. If we did any Republican DA would start charging Clinton, Obama, and Biden. You actually need evidence and a case before you charge someone.

 

[Racist Google Intern]

He is gonna get off, it's probably why Biden team dragged De Niro and those fake cops down there yesterday.

 

[BakersfieldChimp]

Biden using Trump's (and republican's) logic of being allowed to do whatever he wants with full immunity would be hilarious. Imprison Trump indefinitely and never leave the White House.

Republicans surely wouldn't complain, right?

 

[chocolatehellhole]

Yes but DA’s can’t will crimes into existence. If we did any Republican DA would start charging Clinton, Obama, and Biden. You actually need evidence and a case before you charge someone.

They can and do you idiot. Obama should be charged for murdering US citizens abroad without trial, Clinton should be charged for obvious reasons, and Biden should also be charged for obvious reasons.

 

[guest]

He’s probably guilty, they all do it.

I hope he’s put in prison so the white/tradhispanic backbone of america can finally wake up to the fact that the country has been subverted by pinko jews that hate you.

 

[Guest]

Biden using Trump's (and republican's) logic of being allowed to do whatever he wants with full immunity would be hilarious. Imprison Trump indefinitely and never leave the White House.

Republicans surely wouldn't complain, right?

Weaponising the legal system against someone because they’re going to beat you, to the extent of creating 34 felony charges over minor accounting violations isn’t at all like saying he should be free to do whatever he wanted though is it?

 

[Suetonius]

They can and do you idiot. Obama should be charged for murdering US citizens abroad without trial

Thats not a “crime”. I mean obviously to all of us it is. But you COULDN’T charge him because its literally considered an “official act” - Aka the exact argument Trump is using in his Jan 6th / Classified documents case.

Clinton should be charged for obvious reasons, and Biden should also be charged for obvious reasons.

“I want to arrest Clinton” Why? “Obvious reasons”, Holy shit, get that to the grand jury stat!

But i’ll be fair, I don’t disagree, because unlike Obama those dudes committed crimes outside their “official acts” - I.e, pressuring Lewinsky to lie under oath (to cover up his lie under oath) and Bidens own classified documents shit. But with Clinton, there’s no paper trail and Lewinsky would never cooperate. No case. And the DOJ explained exactly why they wouldn’t charge Biden - It’d be useless and he’d likely convince a jury of his haplessness.

 

[BakersfieldChimp]

Weaponising the legal system against someone because they’re going to beat you, to the extent of creating 34 felony charges over minor accounting violations isn’t at all like saying he should be free to do whatever he wanted though is it?

They argued for immunity in the Supreme Court last month. So Trump and his team certainly think he should be free to do what he wants.

 

[Suetonius]

Weaponising the legal system against someone because they’re going to beat you, to the extent of creating 34 felony charges over minor accounting violations isn’t at all like saying he should be free to do whatever he wanted though is it?

Wow suddenly you know a lot about the case and these charges, despite not even being able to explain how Trump didn’t do this an hour or two ago.

 

[chocolatehellhole]

Thats not a “crime”. I mean obviously to all of us it is. But you COULDN’T charge him because its literally considered an “official act” - Aka the exact argument Trump is using in his Jan 6th / Classified documents case.

LOL you are arguing that a President is allowed to murder people (Americans) as an "official act" holy fuck you are an idiot.

 

[Faggot Boqposter]

I once had an enforcement letter from a home owners association because I painted my garage the same color just to freshen it up, and although it was the “approved” color because I didn’t follow the bylaws and ask for permission first, I had to repaint it the same color again and pay a fine.

This is 100% how I view this trial and the case against him, and if you support it because “well acyhually he contravened passage 6.7 of the charter on campaign finance reform laws act 1897 amendment 1b” then I view you the same way as I viewed those hoa goons back then.

Did those millennials also have a problem with your PATRIOTISM and big AMERICAN flag?

 

[chocolatehellhole]

“I want to arrest Clinton” Why? “Obvious reasons”, Holy shit, get that to the grand jury stat!

You probably don't remember the bleachbit saga because you're a zoomer retard.

 

[Suetonius]

LOL you are arguing that a President is allowed to murder people (Americans) as an "official act" holy fuck you are an idiot.

No. I am not arguing that. The country argues that, and argued it successfully. You cannot prosecute a US President for drone strikes, Guantanamo, etc. It all falls under “official acts”. That is NOT me saying I agree with it. But thats what the law is.

 

[Suetonius]

You probably don't remember the bleachbit saga because you're a zoomer retard.

…That was Hilary, I was talking about Bill. Hilary should absolutely be charged too.

 

[Guest]

They argued for immunity in the Supreme Court last month. So Trump and his team certainly think he should be free to do what he wants.

If they just left him alone, he would be out of office in 4 years for good anyway and would more than likely end up disliked regardless.

Do you histrionic tards have any idea the long term damage this causes setting these precedents? It’s fucking insane.