TRUMP TRIAL MEGATHREAD

[chocolatehellhole]

Read. He falsified business records. He rendered the invoices as “legal services” when he had never once paid Cohen for his legal services and he knew this was reimbursement. Thats literally the textbook definition of falsification.

But ok, that’s just a misdemeanor. What makes it a felony? The fact that Cohen broke election law giving an unreported contribution, no less over the limit, to Stormy at the behest and benefit of the Trump campaign. That is against election law. Because Trump paid Cohen back and tried to disguise what this payment was for, that gives a motive to the falsification.

Why should it be a crime? The underlying election law should be a crime because you shouldn’t be allowed to donate insane amounts on the behalf of a candidates campaign without disclosing it - Transparency. Why should falsifying business records be a crime? I seriously shouldn’t have to explain that.

Now please bring me 10,000 whataboutisms

You are a retarded zoomer faggot.

 

[Suetonius]

You are a retarded zoomer faggot.

Ad hominem

 

[chocolatehellhole]

I hear that helps any recipe.

 

[Steve Ramone]

He's guilty in that he did everything he's being accused of, I doubt he'll go to jail though. He's a giant pussy for not testifying.

 

[Guest]

@Sue Lightning would be one of those people in 1984 advocating that nobody is above the law committing thought crimes.

“I know it’s kind of a stupid and evil law, but it’s still the law!”

@Sue Lightning do you also agree with Canada introducing hate speech laws that apply retrospectively to any speech made before the new law? It’s in the law! Nobody should be above it!

 

[chocolatehellhole]

He's a giant pussy for not testifying.

Yes, defendants classically testify.. especially volatile ones who like to rant.

 

[Suetonius]

@Sue Lightning would be one of those people in 1984 advocating that nobody is above the law committing thought crimes.

“I know it’s kind of a stupid and evil law, but it’s still the law!”

@Sue Lightning do you also agree with Canada introducing hate speech laws that apply retrospectively to any speech made before the new law? It’s in the law! Nobody should be above it!

1. Shockingly, the United States is very different from 1984 and Canada
2. That has nothing to do with what I was talking about

What you’re basically saying, and you can correct me if i’m wrong, but Joe Biden can pay a newspaper $130,000 to hide a story about Hunter, not report that as a campaign contribution, then try to hide the payment, and that’s completely fine.

“Bb but Biden would never be charged like Trump is!” And you’re probably right. But thats not what you were just saying. You’re comparing election law with hate speech laws.

In fact I see 0 connection between “You can only donate X to this candidate and you have to report it or you go to jail” and “We’re throwing you in jail if you say fag”

 

[guest]

Sue is annoying, a faggot, but he's not a retard, he's definitely smarter than you @chocolatehellhole

 

[Steve Ramone]

Yes, defendants classically testify.. especially volatile ones who like to rant.

He said he wanted to, but the judge wouldn't let him.

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

Meanwhile Biden and Harris had a campaign rally in Philly that had Elmo from Sesame Street warm up the already small crowd.

Oh, and it the event was to get black votes so Biden told the crowd all kinds of pandering nonsense. We’re probably two months away from Biden claiming to have been born a poor black child

Here’s some highlights from Biden today at the “you black people better vote for me” rally

 

[Suetonius]

“I know it’s kind of a stupid and evil law, but it’s still the law!”

This right here? Fucking draconian. EVIL. First they ask you to report how much money you’re donating to a political candidate and next thing you know the government has outlawed free speech.

 

[guest]

@Sue Lightning would be one of those people in 1984 advocating that nobody is above the law committing thought crimes.

“I know it’s kind of a stupid and evil law, but it’s still the law!”

@Sue Lightning do you also agree with Canada introducing hate speech laws that apply retrospectively to any speech made before the new law? It’s in the law! Nobody should be above it!

About the hate speech law ...it's clearly scare tactics like the fake trucker convoy psyop with all the trucker actors getting their accounts frozen...the target for the scare tactics are outspoken white, conservative Christian types. If they do pass it Trudeau's blackface appearances from decades ago would catch up with him. It's just not a serious thing, but that they are bringing it forth is def cause for alarm vis-a-vis the future of democracy here.

 

[chocolatehellhole]

Sue is annoying, a faggot, but he's not a retard, he's definitely smarter than you @chocolatehellhole

You're bald.

 

[Guest]

Sue is annoying, a faggot, but he's not a retard, he's definitely smarter than you @chocolatehellhole

He can’t convey any thoughts that could be expressed in 30 words in under 500 words. He can’t do maths that a 2 year old Chinese infant could (or a 9 year old white, or Neil DeGrasse Tyson) and he takes the contrarian view for the sake of it like women do.

 

[Suetonius]

and he takes the contrarian view for the sake of it like women do.

How do you know what women do, besides get abortions?

 

[guest]

He can’t convey any thoughts that could be expressed in 30 words in under 500 words. He can’t do maths that a 2 year old Chinese infant could (or a 9 year old white, or Neil DeGrasse Tyson) and he takes the contrarian view for the sake of it like women do.

Lol, he would talk so confidently about supposed lore. Anyway the conduct I got here with the lore cementing, makes me think 99% of the stuff you guys say about Patrick which he refutes are actually untrue. (wallahi, on Allah).

Sue will write a 2000 word post proving to Joe, that he indeed collects child spit (proceeds to cite posts made by @ChildSpitTake and others).

 

[Guest]

View attachment 202257
This right here? Fucking draconian. EVIL. First they ask you to report how much money you’re donating to a political candidate and next thing you know the government has outlawed free speech.

I heard Trump once ordered breakfast at 11:04am from McDonald’s. You should hire a private detective and try to get him the chair for it.

 

[Suetonius]

I just also want to point out NoBackbone can’t actually argue whether Trump is guilty or not. He also can’t even say “He’s guilty but I don’t give a shit / who gives a fuck?” (a completely normal response.) lts just “Look man, you’re gay, alright? This is literally 1984”

 

[Suetonius]

I heard Trump once ordered breakfast at 11:04am from McDonald’s. You should hire a private detective and try to get him the chair for it.

Yes this is the exact same thing! Thank you for proving the comment I just typed about how you can’t even argue the law, or have the backbone to say he did it and you don’t give a shit.

 

[Guest]

I just also want to point out NoBackbone can’t actually argue whether Trump is guilty or not. He also can’t even say “He’s guilty but I don’t give a shit / who gives a fuck?” (a completely normal response.) lts just “Look man, you’re gay, alright? This is literally 1984”

Saying you’re not gay would be the same as saying 2 + 2 = 5.

It’s 1984 alright.