• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

TRUMP TRIAL MEGATHREAD

Comment?


  • Total voters
    54

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,688
The DA was on a mission to find charges to bring in the first place
WHOA!!! And guess what? He “””found””” these charges with EVIDENCE. Evidence that went in front of a grand jury who said “indict this guy”, and now, the evidence was so overwhelming, and the prosecutors made such a cohesive case that he’s guilty, that he was convicted.
and the judge sets the conditions of the trial and sets the sentence.
Refer to above. If there were no evidence, the prosecution has no case. If theres no case, theres no guilty verdict. And if Trump were innocent and this really were some shit invented out of thin air maybe his defense wouldn’t have done such a poor job making him look innocent.
 
Forum Clout
15,854
fine im stupid. we can get that out of the way. What am i supposed to do with this as a response? There's just a bunch of claims there. This is a court case. How would I know its bullshit without understanding the details of the case?

You're working backwards from the conclusion it is bullshit. How would I possibly know this?

You're calling me an idiot (or whatever midwit is meant to imply) and saying to see the bigger picture.
"half the country just lost any trust in the judiciary because of some petty shit." - Is that a bad thing ? Should i care what people think who form opinions without the necessary information?

If the is too dumb and autistic for you to answer then don't. But i have no clue what you're even trying to convey here.

Well for starters, 34 counts for a case is retarded. The higher the count, the more bullshit it usually is.

But you know that
 

Mr. Faggotry

The world’s expert on faggotry
Forum Clout
24,410
I hope you realize judges don’t determine if someone is guilty or not. Didn’t you all call me a retard for this. If you read the transcripts of the trial at all you would realize the judge has carried this out extremely impartially. Wow, he’s a Democrat, almost like that’s a consequence of us having weirdly partisan judges in the USA. Wow, his daughter donated to Democrats, and the courts found that wasn’t necessary for a recusal. You would know any of this if you knew anything about the trial at all.

This is a consequence of DA’s being partisan elected officials. What are you even implying with the prosecutor. His job is to present a case to convict the defendant. So he’s being paid by the anti-defendant league and thats a …conflict of interest? For who? The prosecutor would be MORE inclined to…do his job?

Fucking wrong and such a bad analogy, holy shit you know nothing about this case. Why are you even trying to argue it.

What the fuck does that have to do with anything? If they stopped John Gotti from talking about witnesses and the prosecutors / court officials to possibly intimidate them you would think thats illegal or wrong?
Judges are impartial, than why are the rest of your faggot friends crying because Scalia's wife flew a flag upside down outside their home?
 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,688
Judges are impartial, than why are the rest of your faggot friends crying because Scalia's wife flew a flag upside down outside their home?
Reread it stupit! I said they’re weirdly partisan. I didn’t say they were impartial - They only can ACT impartially…sometimes
 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,688
SHOCKING: Man who participated in a nearly 3 year court battle…BELIEVES IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM
 

NoBacon

An honourable man.
Forum Clout
121,679
Trump probably did that shit and he’s a dummy but the question that should be asked is does someone other than trump have to deal with this.

Something stinks and it isn’t me

Dinesh D’Souza was jailed for donating 10k when the limit is 5k or something, right?

Meanwhile Obama gets paid millions to give fake speeches to banks he enriched etc.

The law is a weapon, nothing more.
 

Mr. Faggotry

The world’s expert on faggotry
Forum Clout
24,410
Reread it stupit! I said they’re weirdly partisan. I didn’t say they were impartial - They only can ACT impartially…sometimes
The implication is that Scalia cannot act impartially because of his wife. And Thomas should be outright removed because he got perks from holding the job. Yet judges can have TDS for eight years and its totally reasonable? The judge in the E. Jean Carroll case acted totally professionally? Mugging for the camera and laughing in court? Interesting.
 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,688
Meanwhile Obama gets paid millions to give fake speeches to banks he enriched etc.

The law is a weapon, nothing more.
Wow youre confident on your opinion of the law despite just saying you know nothing about it. I’m gonna pose the same question you asked me about Trumps charges - Explain to me how Obama getting paid millions to give fake speeches is a crime, and why it should be. (If it is - I won’t waste your time, it is not.)
 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,688
The implication is that Scalia cannot act impartially because of his wife.
You’ve said his name two times. You know Scalias dead and they’re mad about Alito, right…
And Thomas should be outright removed because he got perks from holding the job. Yet judges can have TDS for eight years and its totally reasonable
What you’re failing to leave out is none of them former justices you mentioned are being removed from power. Neither are these TDS ones. I dont know what your point is
The judge in the E. Jean Carroll case acted totally professionally? Mugging for the camera and laughing in court? Interesting.
I was talking about this case stupit.
 

NoBacon

An honourable man.
Forum Clout
121,679
Wow youre confident on your opinion of the law despite just saying you know nothing about it. I’m gonna pose the same question you asked me about Trumps charges - Explain to me how Obama getting paid millions to give fake speeches is a crime, and why it should be. (If it is - I won’t waste your time, it is not.)

You’re operating under the delusional I care what the legal system says, when I’m saying it’s a bunch of outright bullshit.

If the draft was brought back and you had to go and fight Russians in a terrifying trench war, would you think it’s right to be jailed if you refused?

If he gets the punishment this crime warrants, a fine, I’ll have no problem with it, but we both know they’ll pull some fuckery and throw the book at him because “he harmed democracy” or some other histrionic foolishness.
 
Top