Today’s Court Hearing - Link & Live Discussion

[MunchausenByProxy]

all i hear is ching ching chong

 

[LockedHDD__Pot]

We had the chink in our armor today boys

FAWWWWK! I didn't realise what I just said!

 

[Jim Norton’s Wife's Cock]

A pro gay bow tie wearing judge from SF presiding a case involving actual perverts? I demand a retrial in neutral Arkansas!

 

[RoTheHo69]

FUCKIN THING SUCKED

 

[Jenna]

Fuck there was more? I left the zoom when NPS ended, now I go back and it's the damned Joel Glaser Show!

 

[JoeCumiaDotCom]

So is the SFWA denying that they helped pay for the lolsuit? So either Patrick or they are lying. Can't the court just ask Patrick or the SFWA under penalty of perjury what the truth and nothing but the truth is? If they helped him they're on the hook for debt fees. If not, then it's all on Fatty. Seems cut n dry. Why's this judge being such a cocksucker about it?

 

[guest]

Jerry is a stumbling, mumbling prick! We need @notalawyer as co-counsel!

Jerry did very well. This judge was just searching post hoc for reasons to quash this. It was extremely obvious. Jerry countered him several times. When the judge said it was hearsay to refer to the website, Jerry pointed out it was one of the numerous hearsay exceptions. Then the pro tem shifted the goalposts. Well its not hearsay, but you don't have conclusive evidence. The subtle move here was that the burden was shifted to Jen's side. All Jen had to do was show prima facie to avoid the sanctions. Just like Tomlinson had to show for quasi to defeat the sanctions. Except their own website showing it as a requirement is the prima facie. There were about 5 or 6 of these examples of the pro tem not having an answer and then moving the goalposts.

 

[guest]

So is the SFWA denying that they helped pay for the lolsuit? So either Patrick or they are lying. Can't the court just ask Patrick or the SFWA under penalty of perjury what the truth and nothing but the truth is? If they helped him they're on the hook for debt fees. If not, then it's all on Fatty. Seems cut n dry. Why's this judge being such a cocksucker about it?

See my post ^. He obviously has an agenda.

 

[guest]

Where the fuck is the recording? fuck!

 

[Cuphead]

See my post ^. He obviously has an agenda.

That's what confuses me. What's his agenda here? He got a dog in this fight?

 

[guest]

That's what confuses me. What's his agenda here? He got a dog in this fight?
View attachment 42840

Liberal faggot

 

[guest]

As another example, he was pulling shit out of his ass, which Jen called him on. The pro tem was saying that the SFWA isn't a financial institution , Tomlinson is just a member. But there's no case law. He doesn't cite any justification. The type of third party doesn't make a difference.

 

[Meownaw]

That's what confuses me. What's his agenda here? He got a dog in this fight?
View attachment 42840

Leave food out of this.

 

[JoeCumiaDotCom]

See my post ^. He obviously has an agenda.

Would it be a legitimate move to subpoena Brinton to find out if he was paid for his work by Patrick or the SFWA directly or does fall under client/lawyer confidentiality? I can't see the SFWA transferring that much $$$ to Fatso then trusting him to pay Brinton. I imagine they did it themselves.

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

The upside is Pat is still on the hook for over $30k

 

[TorqueWheeler]

I think Lynn is not Lin with an anglo spelling and he looks Japanese, maybe adopted or half white. I hear some Chinese accent though, tough to tell with these gooks. Jen looks either Yalu River crossing 1950 Chink or Korean, totally mixed up gooks.

He sounded Chinese as fuck in the end.

 

[Torque’sHeadBump]

Fawk, Pat is gonna be oinking big time today.

 

[NoBacon]

I refer to my earlier post, it doesn’t matter if you’re following the law and can argue it cohesively, like JJ did. You’re always at the mercy of a judge and how they’re feeling that day. We got a snippy agenda driven Asian rent boy who didn’t want to be proven wrong so that’s it.

 

[RobertMewler]

Time to abandon the pro tem process. Twice now these interim judges have gotten things wrong: Stein about the sanctions, this guy with prima facie evidence.

 

[Caverlock]

Jerry did very well. This judge was just searching post hoc for reasons to quash this. It was extremely obvious. Jerry countered him several times. When the judge said it was hearsay to refer to the website, Jerry pointed out it was one of the numerous hearsay exceptions. Then the pro tem shifted the goalposts. Well its not hearsay, but you don't have conclusive evidence. The subtle move here was that the burden was shifted to Jen's side. All Jen had to do was show prima facie to avoid the sanctions. Just like Tomlinson had to show for quasi to defeat the sanctions. Except their own website showing it as a requirement is the prima facie. There were about 5 or 6 of these examples of the pro tem not having an answer and then moving the goalposts.

Exactly what I was thinking. Thanks for making me feel less crazy.