A file uploaded by @Jenna ? no thanks
-
- Mr. Tomlinson's feud started after members of the now-defunct Reddit site r/opieandanthony got his Twitter account suspended, causing him to threaten some bored trolls who never heard of him with a libel lawsuit. The trolls responded predictably.
- Mr. Tomlinson has been instructed many times by friends, family, police, and attorneys to stop engaging with his trolls, and that continuing to provoke them will cause him to be trolled even more. Mr. Tomlinson wilfully ignores this advice
- He would eventually file a defamation suit against 60 anonymous people which was dismissed with Mr. Tomlinson being ordered to pay $34,762.25 for opposing parties' attorney fees.
- He ended up paying $83,736.99 due to his unsuccessful attempts to dodge the court-ordered judgement, for which he faced jail time and contempt charges.
- He also filed 2 frivolous restraining orders against people who had engaged in First Amendment-protected behavior (one for texting him and another for attending his contempt of court hearing), both of which were dismissed.
- Early on in the lawsuit, Mr. Tomlinson vandalized his own motorcycle and submitted a false police report blaming the people he was suing.
- He accidentally sent surveillance video of the alleged vandal (himself) to a troll.
- Mr. Tomlinson has never shown this video footage during any of his media tours, and desperately tries to scrub it from the internet.
- Mr. Tomlinson claims that the surveillance video was initiated by his "motion-activated" camera, which only collects "30 seconds at a time", despite the video being 32 seconds long and beginning several seconds before the "vandal" enters into the frame.
- On 13 April 2023, the individual responsible for calling the fake emergencies (SWATs) to Mr. Tomlinson's house, a SWAT-for-hire dealer named "Torswats", revealed that Mr. Tomlinson ordered the SWATs to his own house because he wanted to get in the news and sue the MPD for money.
- Torswats would repeat these allegations in private chats which were not intended for public view.
- Mr. Tomlinson has gone on multiple news tours since the SWATtings started in order to promote his victimhood brand, utilizing the services of Lenora Claire.
- He also recently sued the MPD for money.
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al
- Thread starter Cumtown Fags
- Start date
This is a fabrication.
I'm 1 page into it and he already started a sentence with "But".
Did he miss all of third grade grammar? Professional author, etc., etc., etc.
edit: That was statement 6. Followed by two ad hominems, another one staring with "But", and then a histrionic use of "insanity". I commented way too soon. I kinda pray this it's fake as it's just too fucking dumb.
Its written like one of his twitter multi threads
1. Welp,
2. Niki Robinson and Patrick Tomlinson are the targets of a vicious campaign of domestic terrorism...
Also, once you get into the 110's.. how is there so much detail about what's going out over dispatch? Are MKE emergency comms still scannable? Does Pat have a scanner to listen to his (ALLEGED. IN MINECRAFT.) handiwork?
I’d love to be in the room when Rick’s lawyers receive all the videos and realize what a huge mistake they’ve made.
16, dick, never had to be in a lawsuit, but I assume that kind of thing would be first on the list in evidence gathering. While the documents so far read like a very fat retard wrote them, he does apparently have lawyers working on this who can get that kind of thing easily. I wonder if he's writing his own motions to cut costs. It would be classic rick to save 100 dollars on a several hundred thousand dollar lawyer bill by choosing to write the motions himself. It also gives him a chance to add his Professional Author touch that has made him so famous.
Does Officer Petersen suffer from Polio?
It's called "discovery" and when that part of the Milwaukee Grifters' lawsuit commences, it'll be interesting to see whether or not the grifters drop their lawsuit. The city/MPD will also have expert witnesses which are very costly. The grifters, if their lawyers do their jobs, will be warned if they lose this lawsuit they will most likely be on the hook for all of the Defendants' costs and fees. Fatso and his dopey wife are arrogant retards, so they could have a bill which is MUCH higher than Quasi's coming their way if they push this lawsuit to trial.
One thing I just thought about is how win or lose the lawyers, and to a lesser extent pat, will get theirs in the end unless it blows up in their face in a spectacular way. Isn't this firm featured in one of netflix's true crime bullshits? Everyone involved wants to make a name for themselves, and there's always potential and a payday by needlessly escalating things. Hmm. What point was I making?
" Illegally detained"
Pat, they can detain you, especially if your are being difficult
Pat, they can detain you, especially if your are being difficult
If Fatso's lawyers are fronting the bill in a "no fee unless you collect" situation, that is extremely unlikely, but that's how they can lose their asses on this case. Someone is in all likelihood funding Fatso and the dopey wife's latest frivolous lawsuit.
The city/MPD, and most importantly the taxpayers, could lose the case if it goes to trial and the jury is full of dumb nig-nogs with an axe to grind, like O.J.'s jury, but that's extremely unlikely, especially since the white grifters are white, and very unlikeable and unsympathetic grifters.
Fatso and the dopey wife will keep trying to force them to offer a settlement to avoid a trial, but there's a lot of time and a lot of discovery and motions between now and that deadline.
I have no idea how common it is in legal filings but seeing Pat repeatedly use italics to emotionally emphasize something in this legal filing is hurtin my dear old ribs.
Beginning sentences with "But" is common in legal filings and is technically grammatically correct, or at least accepted.
Using italics for emphasis is even more common and accepted.
It's possible Fatso's lawyers sound just as emotional and dumb as Fatso, but all of this looks like typical legal ramblings by actual lawyers (it's usually their paralegals who write these too depending on the size of the firm).
Edit: If his lawyers took his case for a reduced retainer on the agreement that he and his dopey wife would write most of the motions/arguments/answers, that is also not uncommon. The lawyers will edit what is sent to them by their clients so as to protect themselves from sanctions, etc. before its filed, but the lawyers are doing what is asked of them to do by their clients, and that's their job.
Last edited:
I think its pat writing most if not all of it.
Im pretty sure he used " wherefore" in the pro se motion that he filed. I remember making fun of it. I bet a lot of this is a direct copy/paste from that motion filing.
Found it
The use of "wherefore" is common too, but again I don't doubt he's sending his own verbose drafts to the lawyers to edit before filing them. Lawyers HATE writing this mundane shit, and smaller firms like the one Fatso and the dopey wife retained aren't big enough to have interns and paralegals easily whisk them out for them.