- Forum Clout
- 117,069
what's the single best, most convincing piece of evidence presented in this?
It’s different for everybody. For me it’s the breakdown of the footage and how it’s clearly on a stage, the angles, lighting, horizon and the discrepancies of the raw footage and the archive. They edited the original broadcast later to add the appropriate delay of the radio messages, they were instant when it was live and later on it was artificially edited to be the scientifically accurate delay. The training simulation footage before we went is identical to the real thing, it’s super suspicious.
It’s pretty irrefutable proof at least the footage was staged. Perhaps we went but staged the footage because it wasn’t possible to broadcast it then.
That documentary is great because it addresses every single question you could possibly have. Every rebuttal from “how could they cover it up with so many people involved” to “they have lasers on the moon that reflect” - there’s a cogent autistically in depth explanation for it all.
I also find it damning all the stupid little things, we have the draw string pouches in museums but we don’t have the telemetry data? We lost all the tapes, really? All of the blueprints for the ships are gone? Anything important that can debunk it or archive the tech is gone? When they analysed the moon rocks it was petrified wood every time and that’s just human error and not deceitful? Get the fuck outta here.
Last edited: