• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

I wanna see the debtor's movie!

PorqueDealer

Portly Pepperoni Purveyor
Forum Clout
37,868
He barely even plugs his books anymore

I'm not sure there's any point anymore. Maybe for Ark, could get a meatloaf of royalties every year.

1691411922033.png
 

TorquieTwoBeers

Forum Clout
27,010
Not sure if this helps, but just in case Patrick tries to Technicality Tomlinson his way out of this and say "Your honor, I was not referring to John Doe 1, Quasi is someone completely different" - Here is a clip from Pretend Podcast part 3 where he names Quasi by name as the person to whom he owes the judgement. Bonus: Calling the judges incompetent and stupid, saying they misinterpreted the law, confirming the amortization of debts was for Quasi, etc.



Could Quasi's attorneys ask for a gag order wrt going on media tours and discussing (making misleading statements about) the case, the judgement, the judges, the creditor, etc?

At 0:44, he tells a huge whopper of a lie here that is easily disproved by the court records. "The judge pro-tem in our lawsuit case had come right out and said during the hearings that yes, defamation is happening on this site... we had all of the evidence proving our case."

A judge would never, ever say that "during the hearings". That is the type of opinion that would go in a ruling, which as we know because his ruling is public, he never said. You were trying to prove defamation. A judge would never willy nilly say that defamation has been proven "during the hearings". Just once I would love for one of these interviewers to just look at the court documents. It would take ten minutes to prove that Pat is full of shit.

Also, "we had all of the evidence"? The evidence was screenshots of Amazon reviews, like the one dude who reviewed his book with "Sucks". His "evidence" against me personally was that I said that I thought Paul Weimer's review of his book was not legitimate because he's Pat's friend, which I fully believe. Fat liar.
 

FurBurger

What would you do for a Klondike bar?
Forum Clout
22,495
  • Deleted by N/A
Show…

Libby Son Of Loin

WACTIONABLY WEATENING S-S-SUE WIGHTNING
Forum Clout
110,941
Be sure to have all of his tweets where he brags about how wealthy he is (as well as the ones where he says he'll never use a GoFundMe type service) ready if he tries to beg for money online to pay his debts. Remember just recently he claimed to have earned over $10,000 in one month.
$10000 a month is PFG

$10000 in one month for the whole year is a big yikes
 

Chive Turkey

Erock Army Deserter
Forum Clout
32,338
He's referring to Stein saying something to the effect of "it seems like defamation could be happening here", meaning there's prima facie evidence that there could be defamation. Then that goes to the jury to decide, he then went on to say that for the quash to be overcome they needed to show that John Doe 1 was the one making those comments.
Yeah, wasn't that remark even kinda backhanded? I remember the hearing going along the lines of Pat's lawyers pointing at a screenshot and saying: "Look what DiggerNick69 said about my client!", and Stein responding: "That's fine and all, and you'd have a decent case if you were suing DiggerNick69. However, the question at hand is whether any defamation was done by John Doe 1 and so far you've still not produced any evidence to the positive."

I know I'm a broken record but it's fucking astounding looking back and seeing just how badly he fucked up his case by including Quasi. You can't compile an elaborate suit with 60 defendants with multiple charges each and then have absolutely zero dirt on your prime suspect, the guy on which the whole remainder of the suit hinges on.
 

Mike Glyer

Rick is Persona Non Grata on File 770
Forum Clout
14,378
Yeah, wasn't that remark even kinda backhanded? I remember the hearing going along the lines of Pat's lawyers pointing at a screenshot and saying: "Look what DiggerNick69 said about my client!", and Stein responding: "That's fine and all, and you'd have a decent case if you were suing DiggerNick69. However, the question at hand is whether any defamation was done by John Doe 1 and so far you've still not produced any evidence to the positive."

I know I'm a broken record but it's fucking astounding looking back and seeing just how badly he fucked up his case by including Quasi. You can't compile an elaborate suit with 60 defendants with multiple charges each and then have absolutely zero dirt on your prime suspect, the guy on which the whole remainder of the suit hinges on.
Resto and Pat fucked up the case but the case was also damn near useless to begin with. If he didn't include Quasi as a John Doe and Quasi provided all the information he had available, Pat would have obtained email addresses like [email protected]. And then what would he do with that information?

It wasn't like they fucked up a good case; they fucked up an already useless case funded by 80 IQ "nerds" who were throwing an autistic tantrum at being messed with online. Pat is fat.
 
Top