I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! - Part 2

[guest]

[URL unfurl="true"]https://trellis.law/judge/socrates.p.manoukian[/URL]

[URL unfurl="true"]https://m.facebook.com/pages/category/Community/The-People-Vs-Judge-Socrates-Peter-Manoukian-503285119736822/[/URL]

 

[guest]

Some updates in Santa Clara. Nothing too exciting. View attachment 20931


View attachment 20933


View attachment 20934




View attachment 20935



Mr Pena is stating an official record of the result of the SF quash and that the court to be aware of it. There is also some case law aroud decisions in other counties where the facts are the same for the arguments.

As of right now there is a hearing still scheduled and we have the details and the judge assignment.


View attachment 20938

Wouldn’t this subpoena be moot with the related case being dismissed?

Or is this just what Peña has to do in order to get the costs up to this point covered?

 

[Guest]

Pigman is fucked

 

[Guest]

Wouldn’t this subpoena be moot with the related case being dismissed?

Or is this just what Peña has to do in order to get the costs up to this point covered?

Of course the subpoena is moot, however - once the subpoena is filed, Quaso has the right to go through with the quash even if Piggly Wiggly drops the original case.

Essentially this is happening against Pigman’s will, Peña is gonna pound him again and rack up another $5-10k onto his tab.

 

[guest]

Wouldn’t this subpoena be moot with the related case being dismissed?

Or is this just what Peña has to do in order to get the costs up to this point covered?

Yes, but the sanctions are not. The case that Pena cited was similar. It was a CA supreme court decision. The subpoena was revoked and they claimed they did not owe the sanctions. That defeats the whole purpose of the fee shifting statute. The point of first amendment fee shifting (like anti-SLAPP) is that a party with more money can't overwhelm someone with legal costs in order to de facto remove their first amendment protections.

It would be like a large company sues your for slander (Disney etc.), and then gets hit with anti-slapp fees. They dismiss their lawsuit and the fees are now "moot". You're essentially taking your ball and going home with one minute left and you're losing. Then you claim a tie and go on to do the same thing tomorrow.

That said the opposing side may try to argue it.

 

[guest]

Yes, but the sanctions are not. The case that Pena cited was similar. It was a CA supreme court decision. The subpoena was revoked and they claimed they did not owe the sanctions. That defeats the whole purpose of the fee shifting statute. The point of first amendment fee shifting (like anti-SLAPP) is that a party with more money can't overwhelm someone with legal costs in order to de facto remove their first amendment protections.

It would be like a large company sues your for slander (Disney etc.), and then gets hit with anti-slapp fees. They dismiss their lawsuit and the fees are now "moot". You're essentially taking your ball and going home with one minute left and you're losing. Then you claim a tie and go on to do the same thing tomorrow.

That said the opposing side may try to argue it.

Yes that’s what I’m saying. Is this just him saying this is over but here’s the money we already spent so make him pay it.

 

[Stent]

My hairline hasn't moved in over 2 millennia, child.

Judge Socrates. No fucking way. If I kill myself does the simulation reboot?

 

[Guest]

 

[BUBBLER]

Seems like a real nigga and true brotherman

Pigman is fuckedView attachment 20960

 

[SmellenShoehorn]

View attachment 20986

"Heard you was being fat like I wouldn't find out, ese."

 

[Guest]

[SIZE=13px]"Heard you was being fat like I wouldn't find out, [/SIZE][SIZE=13px]ese." [/SIZE]
this dude is actually a based Arab from Lebanon

 

[Chive Turkey]

"Heard you was being fat like I wouldn't find out, ese."
this dude is actually a based Arab from Lebanon

I can't wait for Rick to call him a Nazi white supremacist in spite of the guy fleeing a literal genocide.

 

[Uncle Anthony Cumia]

Great news fellas and the couple of lady fellas here… Pats case in Santa Clara County is being presided over by like the only Conservative judge in the Bay Area. I think a proper data dump of all of Piggy’s tweets about Republicans is in order. I think the judge should know what kinda of smooth brained scumbag piece of shit the plaintiff in this case is.

 

[guest]

A new document was added to the Google Quash. For everyone asking how the withradwl of the complaint in Wiscoin affects the sanctions. I'll let Mr. Pena explain:

 

[guest]

Weird, I wonder why this wasn't mentioned in his twitter thread? People are asking about appeals...and there is still an open case with more sanctions pending. All those people looking to help should know about this as well right?

 

[guest]

I'm starting to think Pat assumed the sanctions would go away if he cut his loses and withdrew in Wisconsin.

 

[AntSucks]

I'm starting to think Pat assumed the sanctions would go away if he cut his loses and withdrew in Wisconsin.

NOT SO!

 

[Guest]

Weird, I wonder why this wasn't mentioned in his twitter thread? People are asking about appeals...and there is still an open case with more sanctions pending. All those people looking to help should know about this as well right?

TYFYS sir. Who pays for Quaso’s collection service? Does that law firm take it out of Quaso’s end or do they somehow bill Patrick?

 

[Cygnus Nana X-1]

I'm waiting for Quasi's counter suit of $75,000,000 for mental anguish caused by Pat's ridiculous solsuit.

 

[Stent]

How many shifts at Panera will it take to repay $30k? Fill out an application.

Don't eat the breadbowls, Rick. They're for customers. I'm not going to warn you again.