I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! - Part 2

[Stent]

There has been a serious development, your honor. The cyber-terrorists are now on social media impersonating inanimate objects from my client's home.

 

[DiarrheaDick]

I have a feeling this one is gonna be boring. "Still waiting on the outcome of actions in California"

"Well, the cat's out of the bag and the bag is in the river, so we'll set a status conference for June"

I don't remember who said it, but it was, "Well the horse is out of the barn, has run down the road and was raped by a pack of niggers."

 

[AntSucks]

I don't remember who said it, but it was, "Well the horse is out of the barn, has run down the road and was raped by a pack of niggers."

I think that was an episode of Matlock.

 

[Cuphead]

Something tells me Judge Ashley isn't going to be happy with Brinton tomorrow

 

[guest]

Something tells me Judge Ashley isn't going to be happy with Brinton tomorrow

"Wait, so after a full year you haven't named a single Jon Doe yet?"

 

[AntsBatteryCharge]

"Wait, so after a full year you haven't named a single Jon Doe yet?"
View attachment 20239

All of a sudden, Urkel becomes Stefan Urquelle.

 

[Stent]

Didn't even get to say goodbye to Kim Folds. Guess I gotta drink this Tanqueray by myself.

 

[Clint Ruin]

I have a feeling this one is gonna be boring. "Still waiting on the outcome of actions in California"

"Well, the cat's out of the bag and the bag is in the river, so we'll set a status conference for June"

I appear to have been incorrect

 

[Will Tate]

Didn't even get to say goodbye to Kim Folds.

Her contact info is public record, hit her up and say hello. Just because the lawsuit's died doesn't mean love can't live on.

 

[Pringle Can Lothario]

Shame. I wanted to serenade her with a bottle of Courvoisier, a Teddy Pendergass album and then wait for her to lay a pussy fart.

 

[TorqueWheeler]

Her contact info is public record, hit her up and say hello. Just because the lawsuit's died doesn't mean love can't live on.

Maybe even invite her to post here.

 

[UnPRePared]

Maybe even invite her to post here.

"Maybe kiss you."

 

[BudDickman]

So that's the state of the Santa Clara Google subpoena now that the Wisconsin case is dismissed?

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

So that's the state of the Santa Clara Google subpoena now that the Wisconsin case is dismissed?

I think the california case is moving to the collection part of the verdict.

 

[Cuphead]

Will there still be a hearing for the Google Subponea or is it Null since the lawsuit is over?

 

[Uncle Anthony Cumia]

Will there still be a hearing for the Google Subponea or is it Null since the lawsuit is over?

Proper proTocol says I will win, child. Of course I’ll be suing Google in SanTa Clara counTy. They’ll side with me, sweet baby child I own a Samsung Flip Tablet/phone device.

 

[guest]

Will there still be a hearing for the Google Subponea or is it Null since the lawsuit is over?

If you look at the case referenced by Schulman in the decision, this is exactly the circumstances around that appeal.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://casetext.com/case/roe-v-halbig/[/URL]

In Roe v. Halbig, 29 Cal. App. 5th 286 (2018), the California Court of Appeals held that a moving party in a California state court action may prevail within the meaning of section 1987.2 even where a subpoena is withdrawn before the trial court rules on the motion to quash.

Even if they revoke the subpoena the quash remains. As for the hearing, it appears the Minc fund is dry, so I don't think anyone will show up from the plaintiff's side. Most likely one of three things happen:

1. The judge makes a tentative ruling before the hearing date. He rules in favor of the quash and sanctions and no one contests it (since that would require more legal fees from Minc and Mayr)
2. The judge's ruling is contested and we see a similar shit show to San Fransisco during the hearing
3. The judge wants more arguments submitted in a similiar fashion to SF as well.

Three seems unlikely. There's also the possibility they refile in Wisconsin and then send more subpoenas, but that wouldn't do anything to void the sanctions owed here on the original subpoena.

<<not a lawyer>>

 

[JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS]

If you look at the case referenced by Schulman in the decision, this is exactly the circumstances around that appeal.

https://casetext.com/case/roe-v-halbig/

Even if they revoke the subpoena the quash remains. As for the hearing, it appears the Minc fund is dry, so I don't think anyone will show up from the plaintiff's side. Most likely one of three things happen:

1. The judge makes a tentative ruling before the hearing date. He rules in favor of the quash and sanctions and no one contests it (since that would require more legal fees from Minc and Mayr)
2. The judge's ruling is contested and we see a similar shit show to San Fransisco during the hearing
3. The judge wants more arguments submitted in a similiar fashion to SF as well.

Three seems unlikely. There's also the possibility they refile in Wisconsin and then send more subpoenas, but that wouldn't do anything to void the sanctions owed here on the original subpoena.

<<not a lawyer>>

So number 2 is the only way we'd get another court video? That's disappointing

 

[guest]

Some updates in Santa Clara. Nothing too exciting.

Mr Pena is stating an official record of the result of the SF quash and that the court to be aware of it. There is also some case law aroud decisions in other counties where the facts are the same for the arguments.

As of right now there is a hearing still scheduled and we have the details and the judge assignment.

 

[Chive Turkey]

"Judge Socrates"

What's next, Commissioner Johnny Cakes?