G
guest
Guest
He is well read, I will give him that.What's your take on Breshears' overall thesis/chronology etc?
I've read most of his books, as tediously written and bogged down in numerology as they are. I find his timeline as or more plausible than the mainstream historical bullshit.
Anyone who starts predicting the end of the world is entering CHARLATAN territory. If Prophet Mohammed SAAW, the best human being had no knowledge of resets, the phoenix phenomena, or when the world will end, why would some Texas felon have ALL the answers?
The chronology stuff is interesting...but I will be honest with you because you are a Westerner with gheera (jealously guarded honor re: your civilization): all these re-interpretations of mainstream (aka WESTERN) history, are funded by Russian deep state interests. They want yall to shit on your accomplishments post-renaissance. Tartaria, Mudfloods, World-fair BS, Phoenix phenomena all that is to shit on your history.
Archaixs thesis is LOOSELY based on Anatoly Fomenko and his phantom-millennium hypothesis...RUSSIAN psyops.