you know in retrospect what I said was too much.. I wouldn't wish that on them since they probably aren't yours anywayAnd I hope you continue to have a miserable life
you know in retrospect what I said was too much.. I wouldn't wish that on them since they probably aren't yours anywayAnd I hope you continue to have a miserable life
Don’t be sad little buddy, people like you are not supposed to be happy.you know in retrospect what I said was too much.. I wouldn't wish that on them since they probably aren't yours anyway
Love him or hate him, Trump has an incredible gift for getting people to just give him money. I can't think of anyone who's ever been better at it. Huge banks, doltish piss-pants rubes, they just gleefully give the guy their cash. Imagine being retarded enough to think giving Trump your money is a revolutionary gesture. Jesus.
OnA producer: FailTrump Airlines: Fail
Trump Mortgage: Fail
Trump Vodka: Fail
Trump: The Game: Fail
Trump Water: Fail
Trump Steaks: Fail
Trump Magazine: Fail
GoTrump.com: Fail
Trump University: Fail (Sued for fraud and settled.)
Trump Shuttle: Fail
Trump Taj Mahal: Fail (Filed bankruptcy during inaugural year.)
Trump Plaza & Casino: Fail (Filed bankruptcy)
Trump Castle: Fail (Filed bankruptcy)
Trump Entertainment Resorts: Fail (Filed bankruptcy)
He also failed to stay out of the nut hut.OnA producer: Fail
Rockstar screenshotter: Fail
Podcast host: Fail
Bootleg ROM seller: Fail
Holiday Inn desk clerk: Fail
Busboy: Fail (fired for stealing table scraps)
Dan Ross: Failure
Which crimes were federal?A state court just convicted a former president of federal crimes? So the blacks weren't completely lying this entire time about this type of bullshit?
"Mr. Trump’s lawyers are expected to argue that Mr. Bragg inappropriately stretched the state election law — a convoluted one, at that — to cover a federal campaign. And they could claim that the false records law itself does not apply to Mr. Trump’s case." -NY TimesWhich crimes were federal?
Well see on appeal then in 4 years. From what ive stumbled upon NY has a law that the SOL is tolled while someone is living out of state. I mean sounds like gamesmanship to me if that's the case. Maybe it can get kicked up to a higher court to rule that law unconstitutional."Mr. Trump’s lawyers are expected to argue that Mr. Bragg inappropriately stretched the state election law — a convoluted one, at that — to cover a federal campaign. And they could claim that the false records law itself does not apply to Mr. Trump’s case." -NY Times
They got around the statue of limitations by tying it to a federal election which in that case should be tried in federal court. Id my dad isn't a judge tho.
That makes no sense (his argument). Trump wasn’t being charged for a federal or state election crime. He was being charged with a felony in NY state. Part of that felony (Falsifying business records) is that there had to be an underlying crime he intended to hide. The underlying crime is the state/federal election law. So that argument just seems really muddy."Mr. Trump’s lawyers are expected to argue that Mr. Bragg inappropriately stretched the state election law — a convoluted one, at that — to cover a federal campaign. And they could claim that the false records law itself does not apply to Mr. Trump’s case." -NY Times
It's an appeal hail Mary. Of course it's going to be muddy.That makes no sense (his argument). Trump wasn’t being charged for a federal or state election crime. He was being charged with a felony in NY state. Part of that felony (Falsifying business records) is that there had to be an underlying crime he intended to hide. The underlying crime is the state/federal election law. So that argument just seems really muddy.
[MEDIA=youtube]oncVe2k6ddk[/MEDIA]That makes no sense (his argument). Trump wasn’t being charged for a federal or state election crime. He was being charged with a felony in NY state. Part of that felony (Falsifying business records) is that there had to be an underlying crime he intended to hide. The underlying crime is the state/federal election law. So that argument just seems really muddy.