"Pretend", a true crime podcast, did a triple feature on Pat published earlier this week. Includes interviews with Pat, Nikki and Hildy!

[HeyItsVos]

I actually feel a bit bad for Resto considering how Patrick’s definition of a landmine is the First Amendment, he must have been the most frustrating and idiotic client ever.

Regardless if someone won or lost in court, the first thing the client asks is what the next steps are are. Like how long until we get any money from the settlement, how much the legal fees are or what should we do now? I’m 100% certain that Resto did not log off Zoom the minute the court hearing concluded and never spoke to him again.

I’d feel bad for Resto if he was honest. He lied to the judge about everyone being Wisconsin-based. He doesn’t get to escape because Patrick ruins everyone’s life he becomes a part of.

 

[NigelCumia]

Any kind of push-back on their story and they really start becoming unhinged. I'm glad it's not me owing $50k+ to these two retards.

THEY'RE TRYING TO KILL US!

Are they?


That's what I didn't get about the episode. The host has this crazy story with an obviously unclear future and he's just dropping it. What a faggot. This could be his golden ticket to podcast fame (upwards of 20 listeners and a recurring Deep Discount ad) and he's going to quit.

It really had the potential to be his Serial especially since he's somehow built the trust of both sides. He's right it's stupid and childish but it's also a fascinating character study.

 

[RickReternal]

It really had the potential to be his Serial especially since he's somehow built the trust of both sides. He's right it's stupid and childish but it's also a fascinating character study.

Not defending his choice to walk away but in the current media environment, a story that ends with a group of trolls who say slurs and do other tasteless things being more sympathetic than the idiot they mock is way too complicated to go mainstream.

 

[Uncle J’s Sink Emporium]

I’d feel bad for Resto if he was honest. He lied to the judge about everyone being Wisconsin-based. He doesn’t get to escape because Patrick ruins everyone’s life he becomes a part of.

I hate to defend Resto but he didn’t lie about anyone being Wisconsin based. What he said was, at the time, because they didn’t know who anyone was, they had no evidence that people were NOT in Wisconsin. It’s just lawyer “gamesmanship” as he would say.

 

[Uncle J’s Sink Emporium]

Ok I listened to part 4. Thoughts:

Dan did a pretty good job. The only thing I’d like brothermen to say next time they get a chance like this is

1. why hasn’t anyone besides Rick been swatted even though “pests” have been around for decades?

2. We call Rick a liar and he calls us liars. We have receipts for everything but where is his evidence?

3. What is his legal explanation for why the court was wrong in his case? Why doesn’t anyone follow up with that? The law is clear so what specifically does he think was misapplied?

 

[JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler]

Part 4:

@41:00 "Dan is a manipulative sociopaT

Freudian Slip?

 

[NigelCumia]

Not defending his choice to walk away but in the current media environment, a story that ends with a group of trolls who say slurs and do other tasteless things being more sympathetic than the idiot they mock is way too complicated to go mainstream.

Pat has soulful eyes though, like a dairy cow

 

[guest]

Dan did a pretty good job.

I'll give him credit for bringing up Hildy when the subject of pedophilia came up. That was a pretty slick move.

 

[Uncle J’s Sink Emporium]

For number 4 you can piece that together kind of from various tweets and interviews. He's said that section 230 doesn't apply if the person is engaging in the defamation. So his argument is that the comments he's submitted about how to report someone's Twitter or about doxxing being legal somehow show 230 was wrongly applied.

His argument will would have been , the evidence we submitted shows quasi committing the torts or assisting them. That's the best you can make of his argument. It's what he'll try to argue.

Even in Josiah interviews he said quasi is careful not to be explicit, except all that means is we got nothing.

He thinks the "single purpose forum" is his winning move. In his mind the argument goes "Quasi admitted to moving hosts becuase doxxing is not illegal. Therefore quasis forum has the sole purpose to harras me". There's just massive logical leaps that he makes. Even the late great judge stein said "that's just a tos violation, what does a company policy have to do with the law".

Right, you can piece together what his point is but he never tries to articulate it to any of these podcasting clowns and that’s what I would like to see, a back and forth discussion of it. Because the obvious question a non-retard host would have is, “where is the evidence that quasi is actually participating”. And the obvious follow-up, “why didn’t you even attempt to submit any of this evidence when they gave you multiple opportunities to do it and calmly explained to your idiot lawyer that is what he needed to do”

 

[Faggot Boqposter]

For number 4 you can piece that together kind of from various tweets and interviews. He's said that section 230 doesn't apply if the person is engaging in the defamation. So his argument is that the comments he's submitted about how to report someone's Twitter or about doxxing being legal somehow show 230 was wrongly applied.

His argument will would have been , the evidence we submitted shows quasi committing the torts or assisting them. That's the best you can make of his argument. It's what he'll try to argue.

Even in Josiah interviews he said quasi is careful not to be explicit, except all that means is we got nothing.

He thinks the "single purpose forum" is his winning move. In his mind the argument goes "Quasi admitted to moving hosts becuase doxxing is not illegal. Therefore quasis forum has the sole purpose to harras me". There's just massive logical leaps that he makes. Even the late great judge stein said "that's just a tos violation, what does a company policy have to do with the law".

All this is true and Resto is a piece of shit (along with the rest of minc law). That whole law firm deserves its day of reckoning with the various regulatory bodies of that industry. There’s no way Resto didn’t get the OK from firm leadership to do some of the shit he did..

I personally would love pat to go on a crusade against Brinton and minc law. Preferably after he is forced to start paying quasi.

 

[guest]

Why are people teasing the idea that pat was not lying (im not loying awright) the accusation that resto didnt say anything about the fact that if they lose they have to pay Quasi?

 

[SFWA liaison]

@41:00 "Dan is a manipulative sociopaT

Freudian Slip?

he also called Ade that, it's his go-to when someone emasculates him

 

[RickReternal]

Why are people teasing the idea that pat was not lying (im not loying awright) the accusation that resto didnt say anything about the fact that if they lose they have to pay Quasi?

 

[Uncle J’s Sink Emporium]

Why are people teasing the idea that pat was not lying (im not loying awright) the accusation that resto didnt say anything about the fact that if they lose they have to pay Quasi?

Even if you believe that, he would have read about it on here. Same with the appeal stuff. We talked about it all the time.

 

[JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler]

Part 4:

God Dan is a retard. can Quasi tell this faggot he doesn't speak for us in any way? Pat absolutely associates with Pedos. Two convicted and one who says trolls are worse than pedos. Dan you fucking middle of the road pussy.