- Forum Clout
- 78,112
- Deleted by N/A
For number 4 you can piece that together kind of from various tweets and interviews. He's said that section 230 doesn't apply if the person is engaging in the defamation. So his argument is that the comments he's submitted about how to report someone's Twitter or about doxxing being legal somehow show 230 was wrongly applied.
His argument will would have been , the evidence we submitted shows quasi committing the torts or assisting them. That's the best you can make of his argument. It's what he'll try to argue.
Even in Josiah interviews he said quasi is careful not to be explicit, except all that means is we got nothing.
He thinks the "single purpose forum" is his winning move. In his mind the argument goes "Quasi admitted to moving hosts becuase doxxing is not illegal. Therefore quasis forum has the sole purpose to harras me". There's just massive logical leaps that he makes. Even the late great judge stein said "that's just a tos violation, what does a company policy have to do with the law".