- Forum Clout
- 33,025
Wait. Now he's saying his lawyers told him to not show up or pay his debt amortization? But he said on the stlaker podcast that it was his decision to not pay, no?
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
1.7Wait. Now he's saying his lawyers told him to not show up or pay his debt amortization? But he said on the stlaker podcast that it was his decision to not pay, no?
…And almost 2 years later he still doesn’t understand you can’t just go into court and say “This person said this other person did this” without having a written statement from the said person.FELONY RESTO HARASSMENT. Enjoy Prison.
View attachment 145509
1 - Pat never consulted a single attorney for this document. If he did he would have named them. Or better yet they would have filed it on his behalf.Pat claims he wrote the document with the assistance of a lawyer. Whether it was McCabe or someone else, that person is either a moron or a brazen liar — but perhaps both, just like Pat.
I love how he can't even be bothered to attend this shit in person. I WANT MY DEMANDS MET CHILD, AND I WANT TO BE ABLE TO SPEAK TO THE JUDGE WITHOUT COMING TO THE COURTHOUSE BECAUSE I'M A FAT LAZY PERSON, LITTLE ONE.
She’s Pat Tomlinson’s lawyer. Horse, barn door, etc.risking her reputation as a lawyer
1 - Pat never consulted a single attorney for this document. If he did he would have named them. Or better yet they would have filed it on his behalf.
2 - If McCabe was in on this tactic to help him write the motion and purposely be retained by him a full working day before the case, she'd be risking her reputation as a lawyer and gain very unfavorably with the judge for the rest of their careers.
The babe would never do such a risky thing for a literal nobody like Pat. Especially as a young girlboss attorney with her whole career ahead of her.
I don't understand, I......…And almost 2 years later he still doesn’t understand you can’t just go into court and say “This person said this other person did this” without having a written statement from the said person.
God this gets better and better. So, his new lawyers tried to get it pushed back 30 days. Rick tried to get it pushed back 60 days, and he wanted to be able to show up via zoom, not in person b/c he's uncomfortable in his TIGHT womans suit, and after all of that they laughed at him and told him NOPE, todays the day. He left the court yesterday in shambles for sure. He thought 100% that they would give him the continuance because he retained a lawyer only a day before the hearing. I love this place.my future wife McCabe's letter:
View attachment 145498
4.) Quasi is not our friend.
"CHILD CHILD CHILD BABY JUDGE CHILD.... I did noT specify h-which counTry the lawyer who assisTed me pracTices in..."View attachment 145544
Prepared with the assistance of a lawyer. Did he ask a lawyer on Twitter something just to put that there?
It was probably either penny eater Peter or Rakdaddy that he claims as his legal assistance. Its full of mistakes. Its so unprofessional. I have always known that once pat is in court, that he will always fuck things up for himself. He can cray and make accusation in the court of twitter but under oath he will either get caught in lies, have an outburst, or not provide sufficient evidence.Pat claims he wrote the document with the assistance of a lawyer. Whether it was McCabe or someone else, that person is either a moron or a brazen liar — but perhaps both, just like Pat.
Since you're a new cumchum, I'll explain something to you: Salted Earth is like ElliotRodgersBRAPTherapist crossed with Valuum crossed with an unironic transsexual. They're a kiwifarms poster who doctored screenshots to deceive and defraud brothermen. Just car-crash their posts and move on, lest you lower your caste further.1 - Pat never consulted a single attorney for this document. If he did he would have named them. Or better yet they would have filed it on his behalf.
2 - If McCabe was in on this tactic to help him write the motion and purposely be retained by him a full working day before the case, she'd be risking her reputation as a lawyer and gain very unfavorably with the judge for the rest of their careers.
The babe would never do such a risky thing for a literal nobody like Pat. Especially as a young girlboss attorney with her whole career ahead of her.
We used to talk on the phone for hoursQuasi is not our friend.
I think it's more about credibility but Scrivener's errors are allowed to be corrected when lawyers make them.16 Dick about the law but maybe someone who knows better can correct or corraborate me. Typos are a huge deal in legal documents. Filing pro se isn’t an excuse and is just another thing that’ll piss off a judge. He pulls two aggredious examples, mistyping the name of a case he’s citing and confusing the terms platiff and defendant. If i’m correct, any case he cited which was typed wrong is irrelevant and can’t be considered. Yes Sosnay could infer he’s talking about the case he spelled correctly the last 3 times but i dont think thats how that works. He would need to basically resumbit the document with the correct spelling. But if it’s not germaine to his overall argument, the confusing of plantiff and defendant definitely is. You then have to ask yourself who the fuck he’s even talking about and where. Was the one line a typo? Or was that the correct line? Back to refiling the entire argument after you correct it.
No they're not. At most the judge asks for clarification but a typo isn't going to derail a case.Typos are a huge deal in legal documents.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/