• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Patrick gets asked why he doesn't just block trolls, goes on a long rant and ignores the question

Forum Clout
41,899
Sued and won, Rick. Sued and won.
Isn't saying the judge "agreeing" there were "years of criminal harassment and defamation" yet another lie? Didn't the judge only say something like he doesn't condone the behavior of the trolls, but there's nothing he can do about it? He didn't specifically state the trolls were committing crimes, did he?

Jamie, bring up the court transcripts.
 

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
77,895
If you forfeit a game you lost. If you voluntarily withdraw a lawsuit, you lost.

Words can have definitions that are nessisary, sufficient or both. All forfeits are losses but not all losses are forfeits.

Dis nigga still out here affirming the consequent. Maybe he needs a refresher on remedial problem solving.


(That's a philosophy phrase to so show how smart and cool I am)
 

Faggot Boqposter

The Alawite Assassin
Forum Clout
32,698
Isn't saying the judge "agreeing" there were "years of criminal harassment and defamation" yet another lie? Didn't the judge only say something like he doesn't condone the behavior of the trolls, but there's nothing he can do about it? He didn't specifically state the trolls were committing crimes, did he?

Jamie, bring up the court transcripts.
Wasnt it something to the effect of “if what you’re saying is true then it’s possible harassment and defamation are taking place” or whatever?

Unfortunately Patrick had comically bad lawyers who focused on something that wasn’t relevant. The wily beaner on the other hand knew not to get stuck on such things
 

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
77,895
Isn't saying the judge "agreeing" there were "years of criminal harassment and defamation" yet another lie? Didn't the judge only say something like he doesn't condone the behavior of the trolls, but there's nothing he can do about it? He didn't specifically state the trolls were committing crimes, did he?

Jamie, bring up the court transcripts.
It was stein who was the pro tem. He was saying that there were things in the complaint that could mayne rise to defamation but nothing that john doe 1 said.


Rick is so desperate for any kind of win he's ignoring the actual court rulings in two seperate jurisdictions by actual judges. Vs an off the cuff remark made by essentially the "practice judge". They have no authority and he didn't even add that to his written report to Schulman. No a judge didn't agree to that. He's not a judge and he didn't even agree anyway.
 

DrTorqueCarlisi

Go to mass
Forum Clout
29,256
160bbe6f04a343bbe4ce0e200e403d19.png
 

MonsterSteve

Age.
Forum Clout
32,399
If you forfeit a game you lost. If you voluntarily withdraw a lawsuit, you lost.

Words can have definitions that are nessisary, sufficient or both. All forfeits are losses but not all losses are forfeits.

Dis nigga still out here affirming the consequent. Maybe he needs a refresher on remedial problem solving.


(That's a philosophy phrase to so show how smart and cool I am)
I forget. How did Rick do in his problem solving class?
 
Top