- Forum Clout
- 769
Not as small as your fag dad’s.Your dick is small.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
Not as small as your fag dad’s.Your dick is small.
I gouged tiny-penis-having Prophet Muhammad’s eyes out sandnigger. Hail Brenton Tarrant, you linguistically adept but otherwise low IQ camel shit. You shouldn’t be allowed to breathe. You and Christards both stole your faiths from kikes and Zoroastrians.It doesnt even do that, it just makes the father/husband the king of his castle.
Intellect is overrated and a fitna/test, most the inhabitants in heaven will be low IQ rubes.I gouged tiny-penis-having Prophet Muhammad’s eyes out sandnigger. Hail Brenton Tarrant, you linguistically adept but otherwise low IQ camel shit. You shouldn’t be allowed to breathe. You and Christards both stole your faiths from kikes and Zoroastrians.
no uNot as small as your fag dad’s.
Sad how you can’t admit that you’re not very bright.I think he's trying to tell us that he's circumcised and he's mad about it
You're relying on historical standards of evidence that would make almost every other historical figure who ever lived mythical. The three historians you mentioned were working from sources from the past because that's the job so unless you're going to write off everything a historian ever recorded on the basis that "They didn't see it." I don't see your point. Nice try, rabbi.Lol. So your argument is deny history cuz muh hated kikes own media, hedgefunds, etc. now and for the past few hundred years.
There are no eye witness historical accounts of your Anus Christ outside of the mythological New Testament. Tacitus (born 56 ACE), Pliny The Younger (born 61 ACE), Josephus (born 37 ACE [AD]), etc. were born way after and Pontius Pilate never even wrote an actual letter to Tiberius or anyone about this. There was a forgery missing the original Greek though.
So there’s no actual historicity of your Jesus, the first gospel of Mark wasn’t written til around 50 years after he supposedly died, and the ecumenical council didn’t even agree to what the trinity was til 325 ACE in Nicea but you require all these exact manuscripts for the Torah/Old Testament in perfect, original, written form, even though the Dead Sea scrolls are not even originals, yet you believe in them substantiating Christianity.
Contradictory and dumb.
You mention the second temple being sacked around 70 ACE but if anything more Jewish sources would have been destroyed than anything Christian. Retarded.
The first temple fell 586 BCE and even Babylonians, who did it, wrote about it. I guess magically back then they were already Christians even though Christian’s hadn’t existed yet and their prophecies were just magically already there, huh?
Retarded Logic fail.
“I’m my own grandpa!”
Hahaha!!! “Intellect is overrated.” You’re probably one of the first Muslim camel shits to admit that. I still think that your kind should be put to the burning stake but you are funny, Ali! Mashallah.Intellect is overrated and a fitna/test, most the inhabitants in heaven will be low IQ rubes.
"Zoroastrian" is a fake name...throughout history they were known as Magi/Magians. And we put out their fire and put them in the dustbin of history, but we protected and incubated Christianity and Judaism because they are Abrahamic.
Lol now I know you're a fucking idiot. Nobody ever said the new testament was in the dead sea scrolls. Why are you bringing it up against Jesus?Btw the Dead Sea Scrolls have pieces of the Jewish Pentateuch that radiocarbon testing proved date to the late third or early second centuries BCE, while your supposed savior didn’t come til hundreds of years later, stupid… so there’s scientific proof that you’re wrong, but I guess the kikes invented science to send us to hell, right?
Boqboqboq sit down somebody who lies better than you is here don't worry you got this4chan spirituality...4chan spirituality everywhere
Last serious/big response I’ll give you.You're relying on historical standards of evidence that would make almost every other historical figure who ever lived mythical. The three historians you mentioned were working from sources from the past because that's the job so unless you're going to write off everything a historian ever recorded on the basis that "They didn't see it." I don't see your point. Nice try, rabbi.
You're also arbitrarily excluding the gospels because they were written by the people involved on the basis that they were involved. What's your standard for rejecting them on that basis? Makes no sense. Jesus would have been nobody to Pilate, not worth writing about. Pilate crucified three that day at a minimum and that was probably about average.
After that you're getting into doctrine and shit, just flailing like all you retards do when you're challenged. We were talking about history, not your retarded simplifications of the councils. "They agreed on it at Nicea so that means they invented it." So if you and I both independently measure the length of the stick somebody beat your stupid head in with, meet together to compare our results and find we agree we're inventing it?
Second temple... https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/faq/destruction-second-temple-70-ce
Are you a boqciple? Very similar stupidity and lying.
Also, not because they were involved but because they were fictional characters from the New Testament.You're relying on historical standards of evidence that would make almost every other historical figure who ever lived mythical. The three historians you mentioned were working from sources from the past because that's the job so unless you're going to write off everything a historian ever recorded on the basis that "They didn't see it." I don't see your point. Nice try, rabbi.
You're also arbitrarily excluding the gospels because they were written by the people involved on the basis that they were involved. What's your standard for rejecting them on that basis? Makes no sense. Jesus would have been nobody to Pilate, not worth writing about. Pilate crucified three that day at a minimum and that was probably about average.
After that you're getting into doctrine and shit, just flailing like all you retards do when you're challenged. We were talking about history, not your retarded simplifications of the councils. "They agreed on it at Nicea so that means they invented it." So if you and I both independently measure the length of the stick somebody beat your stupid head in with, meet together to compare our results and find we agree we're inventing it?
Second temple... https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/faq/destruction-second-temple-70-ce
Are you a boqciple? Very similar stupidity and lying.
أنا أشتهي الجداتكنت ميتاً في بحور الغي والإثم غريقا
I used to be dead in seas of error and sin, drowning.
كنت عبداً في قيود الذنب مملوكا رقيقا
I was a slave in shackles of sin, a captive, a slave
مد لي الشيطان من أسبابه حبلاً وثيقا
Satan extended to me from his causes a rope guaranteeing deliverance
منكراتِ كنت آتيها غروبا وشروقا
Evils and things disliked by Allah, I went to them from sunset till sundown
غزت الآثام لحمي ثم عظمي والعروقا
The sins attacked my flesh, then my bones and my viens (Hello @Turk February )
كنت في التفحيط نجماً يبهر الدنيا بريقا
I was engulfed in the bedazzling glint of the material stars of this world
أجهدت سيارتي من شدة الزحف الطريقا
I struggled hard upon my path
يارفيق الدرب مهما كنت فذاً لن تفوقا
Oh friend, whichever path [I chose] I was alone, not superior
والجماهير أصمتني صفيراً ونعيقا
And the masses encouraged me, whistling and whooping
كم أطاراً كان يبلى ثم أرميه عتيقا
How many rings was he wearing then was his throw old?
كم دخلت السجن مراتِ فأزداد فسوقا
How many times did I leave the prison, only to increase my debauchery?
أصبح الوجدان قفرا ظامئ الأرض سحيقا
My conscience became a wasteland, abysmally dry
أنني أحتاج غيثاً صافياً يكفي بروقا
Truly I need a summer shower, saved by lightning (of Islam)
أنني أحتاج غيثاً صافياً يكفي بروقا
Truly I need a summer shower, saved by lightning (of Islam)
صافياً يكفي بروقا
In the summer, saved by lightning (of Islam)
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/