• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Hyde gets 30 years

Jizz

Forum Clout
9,687
"After being found guilty, we learned Masterson wasn't put in lockup with the general population at the L.A. County Men's Central Jail -- where he's been awaiting his sentence -- but instead was in "administrative segregation"


I wonder if they will try and move him into gen pop when he gets to prison? i bet he will have a tough time. I know guys like OJ get respect in prison but I doubt he will. Hopefully he has the money to pay for protection!
 
Forum Clout
1,435
"After being found guilty, we learned Masterson wasn't put in lockup with the general population at the L.A. County Men's Central Jail -- where he's been awaiting his sentence -- but instead was in "administrative segregation"


I wonder if they will try and move him into gen pop when he gets to prison? i bet he will have a tough time. I know guys like OJ get respect in prison but I doubt he will. Hopefully he has the money to pay for protection!

I'm pretty sure the Church of Scientology is a CIA front since its founding. He'll probably have the best life a prisoner could possibly have in administrative segregation.

Not endorsing the way in which he was brought to "justice" 20 years later, but no one linked with Scientology or the Process Church or Led Zepplin or any of the offshoots of Crowley's philosophy are innocents.
 
G

guest

Guest
He'll be 77 when he gets out.

steven-hyde.gif
Has it easy

IMG_3923.jpeg
 

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
119,157
Everyone freaking out at the lack of physical evidence. I don’t know if anyone knows this but you don’t need physical evidence to prosecute for a rape or murder. Hell OJ literally got off despite having physical evidence and a strange alibi. He was tried in front of a jury. If you don’t know how juries work they need all 12 people to find the person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. A lack of evidence makes it harder to decide if this occurred beyond a reasonable doubt, but the fact that they came to that conclusion WITHOUT physical evidence shows theres truth in these claims.

If he’s actually innocent, which doesn’t seem likely, he’ll have his case heard in an appeal. Besides that you’re all self inserting and worrying that the girl you had questionable sex with 30 years ago can send you to jail. This is not the same thing. He violently raped these women. He can rot in jail
 

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
119,157
How is anyone supposed to defend themselves from an allegation that's twenty years old? Especially someone who was famous.
Its pretty simple. Someone as famous as this would have had some track record of his schedule back then relaying where he was on the night of the rapes. If he doesn’t remember, there are likely agents or coworkers who remember seeing him who could testify he wasn’t at (x) place during the rapes. If those don’t exist, there’s some sort of papertrail that still exists that places him at the crime scene or away from them. Polygraphs are pretty shoddy evidence but he could take one of those two testifying if he had ever seen the women or had sex with her. The important thing that other people are missing is it’s not like these women came out of the wood work about this guy. They knew and told people during these 30 years and some even went to the police but the scientology cult protected him.
 

BonnieMcFarlaneMe2

❤️bonnie bonnie bonnie❤️
Forum Clout
85,741
Everyone freaking out at the lack of physical evidence. I don’t know if anyone knows this but you don’t need physical evidence to prosecute for a rape or murder. Hell OJ literally got off despite having physical evidence and a strange alibi. He was tried in front of a jury. If you don’t know how juries work they need all 12 people to find the person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. A lack of evidence makes it harder to decide if this occurred beyond a reasonable doubt, but the fact that they came to that conclusion WITHOUT physical evidence shows theres truth in these claims.

If he’s actually innocent, which doesn’t seem likely, he’ll have his case heard in an appeal. Besides that you’re all self inserting and worrying that the girl you had questionable sex with 30 years ago can send you to jail. This is not the same thing. He violently raped these women. He can rot in jail
It’s a tough one, man. Also he got thrown off that stupid Ranch Netflix show but they wrote him out with his participation instead of just not featuring him in any more episodes.
 

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
119,157
It’s a tough one, man. Also he got thrown off that stupid Ranch Netflix show but they wrote him out with his participation instead of just not featuring him in any more episodes.
I mean I don’t buy when these women come out of the woodwork 30 years and leave it at an accusation. But once you go to the police and that person gets convicted…i mean what more can you do to say the guys guilty other than having him fully confess
 

BonnieMcFarlaneMe2

❤️bonnie bonnie bonnie❤️
Forum Clout
85,741
I mean I don’t buy when these women come out of the woodwork 30 years and leave it at an accusation. But once you go to the police and that person gets convicted…i mean what more can you do to say the guys guilty other than having him fully confess
Sigh, it’s a tough one man and since I genuinely didn’t follow the case I can’t really say anything, genuinely. My egg whites are cold.
 
Forum Clout
1,435
I wasnt following this case at all so I have no idea what damning evidence was so bad they hit him with the entire court system. Those are numbers even some killers dont get so something must have been extreme.

A kid I went to HS with got drunk and dropped acid at a house party in Los Angeles when he was in his early 30's. (This is the mid 00's.) He got inappropriate with the chicks there and none of those West Coast fags threw him out of the house, so he kept molesting chicks all night. (He wasn't an evil dude he just came from a backwards culture and never did drugs as a kid.) He was sentenced to 2 consecutive 15 year sentences because 2 of the sex crimes he committed that night fell under California's "One Strike Law."

I'm not familiar with it but that's probably what happened to Hyde. A particular sex offense plus a specified aggravating circumstance equals a mandatory sentence of 15 to life, multiplied by the amount of times he was "proven" to have done such things, with the sentences to be served consecutively. That's what I get from a quick perusal of the appellate court's affirmation of my friend's sentence.

And yes, that young man I went to high school with has spent every day of his life in the comfort and care of the California State Correctional System since the mid 00's and after looking up his record online he won't be eligible for parole until 2026. He turned 50 in Soledad.
 
Forum Clout
17,201
Everyone freaking out at the lack of physical evidence. I don’t know if anyone knows this but you don’t need physical evidence to prosecute for a rape or murder. Hell OJ literally got off despite having physical evidence and a strange alibi. He was tried in front of a jury. If you don’t know how juries work they need all 12 people to find the person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. A lack of evidence makes it harder to decide if this occurred beyond a reasonable doubt, but the fact that they came to that conclusion WITHOUT physical evidence shows theres truth in these claims.

If he’s actually innocent, which doesn’t seem likely, he’ll have his case heard in an appeal. Besides that you’re all self inserting and worrying that the girl you had questionable sex with 30 years ago can send you to jail. This is not the same thing. He violently raped these women. He can rot in jail
He's a Scientologist, that's all the proof I need.
 

Slackjawed Cow

I laugh at them because they're all the same.
Forum Clout
268,535
A kid I went to HS with got drunk and dropped acid at a house party in Los Angeles when he was in his early 30's. (This is the mid 00's.) He got inappropriate with the chicks there and none of those West Coast fags threw him out of the house, so he kept molesting chicks all night. (He wasn't an evil dude he just came from a backwards culture and never did drugs as a kid.) He was sentenced to 2 consecutive 15 year sentences because 2 of the sex crimes he committed that night fell under California's "One Strike Law."

I'm not familiar with it but that's probably what happened to Hyde. A particular sex offense plus a specified aggravating circumstance equals a mandatory sentence of 15 to life, multiplied by the amount of times he was "proven" to have done such things, with the sentences to be served consecutively. That's what I get from a quick perusal of the appellate court's affirmation of my friend's sentence.

And yes, that young man I went to high school with has spent every day of his life in the comfort and care of the California State Correctional System since the mid 00's and after looking up his record online he won't be eligible for parole until 2026. He turned 50 in Soledad.
That makes sense. I knew they had 3 strikes but this One Strike must be fairly new.
 
Forum Clout
1,435
That makes sense. I knew they had 3 strikes but this One Strike must be fairly new.

Yeah I think his eligibility for parole is even newer. The last time I looked him up I thought he'd be in prison till he was in his early 60's but they have a program for "elderly" inmates now. If you are over 50 and have served 20 continuous years or over 60 and served 25 and your sentence wasn't Life without possibility of parole, you get a hearing. (Got that from the California prisoner lookup system.)

So all is not lost for Hyde. He just needs to hope the immigration system stays broken and the prisons stay crowded till he's eligible in 20 years.
 

Slackjawed Cow

I laugh at them because they're all the same.
Forum Clout
268,535
Yeah I think his eligibility for parole is even newer. The last time I looked him up I thought he'd be in prison till he was in his early 60's but they have a program for "elderly" inmates now. If you are over 50 and have served 20 continuous years or over 60 and served 25 and your sentence wasn't Life without possibility of parole, you get a hearing. (Got that from the California prisoner lookup system.)

So all is not lost for Hyde. He just needs to hope the immigration system stays broken and the prisons stay crowded till he's eligible in 20 years.
He will be a protected prisoner and have a private room and TV. Way easier then it should be.
 
Top