G
guest
Guest
Could you apply some of your zero legal training and practice to speculate why the Fat One is so adamant that he owes nothing to Quasi? Is he just a mental compulsive liar or does he have a trotter to stand on?
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
G
guest
Guest
Also seems like it would be a great time to be an author or content creator of any type while people are stuck at home for so long. Weird..
G
guest
Guest
Don’t waste the gentleman’s time with such a silly question.
- Forum Clout
- 62,637
Except the one he just went to. Where he was photographed alone, nobody wanting an autographed copy of his books.
Panelists - DisCon III
Panelists This is a partial list of panelists for DisCon III. Please note this list is partial and does not include all DisCon III panelists. This list only includes panelists who agreed to share their participation publicly. All assorted programming will have panelist information next to their...
discon3.org
Where the list of selected panelists is readily available on the internet. Spoiler: Patrick S Tomlinson did not make the list.
- Forum Clout
- 95,946
Oh, the plaintiff himself states his reputation has not been tarnished? Case dismissed.
- Forum Clout
- 232,573
I believe they had him on a couple panels that involved fighting the trolls with Pat telling everyone how to properly destroy the trolls because he’s a specialist. Of course that was before we came along and the SFWA learned it’s best to not fight trolls.Except the one he just went to. Where he was photographed alone, nobody wanting an autographed copy of his books.
Panelists - DisCon III
Panelists This is a partial list of panelists for DisCon III. Please note this list is partial and does not include all DisCon III panelists. This list only includes panelists who agreed to share their participation publicly. All assorted programming will have panelist information next to their...
Where the list of selected panelists is readily available on the internet. Spoiler: Patrick S Tomlinson did not make the list.
G
guest
Guest
That's an actual misspelling, as in he has no clue that he made a tacit admission of illiteracy by getting that wrong.
- Forum Clout
- 73,476
Great banter, it really is.
Pat really is a fatter, unfunier more delusional Alan Partridge.
- Forum Clout
- 77,317
We need more people pointing out he meant “tacit” and is illiterate. We need as much studying before our 3rd grade spelling test.
- Forum Clout
- 9,525
He doesn't write them worth a shit either.
- Forum Clout
- 259,300
Pretty sure he went to a spaceship model one in kentucky earlier in the year too.Except the one he just went to. Where he was photographed alone, nobody wanting an autographed copy of his books.
Panelists - DisCon III
Panelists This is a partial list of panelists for DisCon III. Please note this list is partial and does not include all DisCon III panelists. This list only includes panelists who agreed to share their participation publicly. All assorted programming will have panelist information next to their...
Where the list of selected panelists is readily available on the internet. Spoiler: Patrick S Tomlinson did not make the list.
- Forum Clout
- 9,725
I just want Patrick - in a very clear, concise way - to explain why he doesn't owe anyone anything, based on his interpretation of the ruling of Judge Schulman.
I just want someone to unpack the ruling, the precedent behind it (as in: When a ruling like this is made, Party A has to pay Party B or face X consequences, etc), and link that fucking part of the court paper, in their text exchange with him (where it explicitly states that he has to pay up X amount to Party B).
I want someone to lay it out as clearly as they can to Patrick, without giving him a way out - through obfuscation or non-acknowledgement - that wouldn't make him look bad, stupid and crazy at the same time.
I just want someone to unpack the ruling, the precedent behind it (as in: When a ruling like this is made, Party A has to pay Party B or face X consequences, etc), and link that fucking part of the court paper, in their text exchange with him (where it explicitly states that he has to pay up X amount to Party B).
I want someone to lay it out as clearly as they can to Patrick, without giving him a way out - through obfuscation or non-acknowledgement - that wouldn't make him look bad, stupid and crazy at the same time.
- Forum Clout
- 66,165
Stupid fat boomer
- Forum Clout
- 232,573
That’s right Pat, you def don’t want to be bothered with promotional work to sell your books if you have to do it over zoom!View attachment 18392Oh. THAT'S why he's not on any more panels, podcasts, interviews, etc. It was HIS choice
G
guest
Guest
Very observant. The sacred and the propane.
- Forum Clout
- 32,285
"Every 2008 Mustang was a V6" was a kick to the ribs.
- Forum Clout
- 49,762
He has admitted on multiple occasions that he cannot debate because he would get too frustrated and The Rage Monster
would come out-- you know, like a fucking retard/child.
- Forum Clout
- 95,946
He has admitted on multiple occasions that he cannot debate because he would get too frustrated and The Rage Monster
- Forum Clout
- 49,762
Spoken like a true intellectual.