• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

2025 is closing in...what are your plans sassters?

Jenna

ridin down melvin with that iron
Forum Clout
65,485
Which is fine, and you don’t see me demanding Ray Wilson reveal this stuff, but your whole thing is being condescending to people. I strongly suspect you couldn’t tell me anything interesting if you tried.

It's your medical-level narcissism that causes you to go "your whole thing is being condescending to people!" and then the very next sentence go "you couldn't tell me anything interesting if you tried!"
 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,557
Historians rely on "declassified" primary sources all the time... have some cynicism young blood.

Peer review study for example is practically meaningless. I suggest you watch this, fuckin outstanding explanation of your "academic" realm:



"Mentally ill" is so meaningless, it is one of the slurs hurled at Prophet Mohammed SAAW by people like Abu Jahl. Yet 1400 years later, you know of Mohammed, but you dont know Abu Jahl. The truth can sound crazy af.

If you cant see the "gravy" in this video's argument, you are gone.

This is getting away from the argument. My point is not to stand here saying “BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ! TRUST THE SCIENCE!” What i’m getting at is that its extremely foolish to think ALL HISTORY is fake. That is such a loaded and general statement that cannot possibly be backed up. You can find events that have been outright falsified but how do 1, 10, 100, 10,000 FAKE events compare to…ALL OF HISTORY. Do you get what i’m saying? You could not possibly disprove ALL of it.

Furthermore, my secondary point…you need to read it even if you think its bullshit. Why? Because then the conversation goes like this:

“History is fake”
How?
“Idk, it just is.”

Reading it allows you to actually come up with an argument as to why its fake. How can you disprove the official story if you don’t even know the official story, or the evidence used to say its true?
 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,557
^ Let me use an example everyone will understand. Look at people who believe the Holocaust and disavow anything that implies parts of it were fake. I can guarantee NONE OF THEM have actually read Holocaust theories which would give them the info set to then be able to say if its true or not. But they just dismiss it out of hand. Its the same shit the other way. How can you say the Holocaust is fake if you don’t know the official history of it? You need that to then be able to say “Well actually, no, THIS happened”
 

NoBacon

An honourable man.
Forum Clout
121,531
This is getting away from the argument. My point is not to stand here saying “BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ! TRUST THE SCIENCE!” What i’m getting at is that its extremely foolish to think ALL HISTORY is fake. That is such a loaded and general statement that cannot possibly be backed up. You can find events that have been outright falsified but how do 1, 10, 100, 10,000 FAKE events compare to…ALL OF HISTORY. Do you get what i’m saying? You could not possibly disprove ALL of it.

Furthermore, my secondary point…you need to read it even if you think its bullshit. Why? Because then the conversation goes like this:

“History is fake”
How?
“Idk, it just is.”

Reading it allows you to actually come up with an argument as to why its fake. How can you disprove the official story if you don’t even know the official story, or the evidence used to say its true?

It’s because I’m 10 years older than you and I know how fruitless it is. You have to remember people bought Covid and got vaccinated, and they think we landed on the moon in big Pepsi cans that also took jeeps with them.

NASA photoshop pictures of galaxies, or “audio record” black holes and people marvel at it, when it’s literally not real. Remember when they posted a close up shot of pepperoni pizza and said it was a star?

History is total unequivocal bullshit.
 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,557
It’s because I’m 10 years older than you and I know how fruitless it is. You have to remember people bought Covid and got vaccinated
That is not history that was 4 years ago.
and they think we landed on the moon in big Pepsi cans that also took jeeps with them.
NASA photoshop pictures of galaxies, or “audio record” black holes and people marvel at it, when it’s literally not real. Remember when they posted a close up shot of pepperoni pizza and said it was a star?
Oh look another topic you claim is bullshit but also claim to know a lot about. Btw what deep research did you do on this? Read some books? Or did you just watch youtube and tiktoks which explain to you the official story and how it’s bullshit and the real story. Wow! So nice not to think for yourself, at all.
History is total unequivocal bullshit.
So did the fall of Rome happen or not? Answer.
 

NoBacon

An honourable man.
Forum Clout
121,531
That is not history that was 4 years ago.

Oh look another topic you claim is bullshit but also claim to know a lot about. Btw what deep research did you do on this? Read some books? Or did you just watch youtube and tiktoks which explain to you the official story and how it’s bullshit and the real story. Wow! So nice not to think for yourself, at all.

So did the fall of Rome happen or not? Answer.

 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,557
Watch it, retard.
No i’m not a fucking drone who gets information from Youtube videos you fucking loser. I literally would have accepted a shady 2000’s era conspiracy website over this shit.

I’m prone to being a “conspiracist”. As you and I have talked about I believe in UFO’s. But the difference is is that my belief in them doesn’t come based on “feeling” or fucking retarded Youtube documentaries. It comes from sources. And when I read those sources I compare it to other information to see if it lines up, or what other people think about this information (after all, i’m not right in interpreting or understanding everything)

You watched this video and with 0 further thought just said “Yeah thats it, moons fake, moon landing never happened.”

You are literally a sheeple. The only difference is the herd you follow.
 

Child..

Patrick Tomlinson > the people in Litcrit
Forum Clout
-9,849
I trust Islamic history

I trust the records I saw when I went to Damascus. My ancestor was an Arab who had to escape the Mameluke conquest of Yemen. He fled to the African coast in the 1440s (translating to the Gregorian calendar). So 600 years ago-ish. The Mamelukes being slave-kings never made sense to me, but they pulled a January 6 on the Ayyubids (Saladin's dynasty), and succeeded. These were bumpkins and yokels brought from Turkestan and Circassia..."white ppl" that never bothered learning Arabic, but outwardly converted to Islam.

They ruled much of the Muslim realm up until Napoleon showed up in Egypt in 1799 and whooped them with his cannons.

Everything after in the Middle East...is as murky to me as western history. The Al-Saud popped up around this time, from fucking nowhere for eg...Then India (The Mughals actually, where the English term "Mogul" came from) succumbing not even to an actual "army" but like the corporate militia of a fawkin spice exporting outfit???? (British East India Company). Make that make sense to me, please. So basically, Mall security conquers a fawkin sub-continet? Riiiight.

Oh, prior to that, all the way on the other side of the "globe"... a guy named Christophe Columbus did some things. Did he?

Columbian exchange and how wimpy the Aztecs were facing 3-4 Conquistadors make ZERO logical sense (unless you need to establish a premise for white supremacy). Make that make sense.

Napoleon's rise and the Napoleonic era makes ZERO sense...Guilotines sound like a myth/scare-y booboo stuff. "We came up with this humane device and beheaded all the sassy french kangs and sassy clergy"...make it make sense, please.

Why does George Washington look like a dopplegagger of King George III?

Why did Czar Nicholas II look like a body double for King George V?
 

Jenna

ridin down melvin with that iron
Forum Clout
65,485
Watch it, retard.

I keep trying to explain this point to you. If I watch a youtube documentary about Jacksonville rappers killing each other, and you watch a youtube documentary about how the moon landing was fake, that doesn't make you smarter than me. That just means we watched different youtube videos.

You do EXACTLY what Patrick does. Which is you watch your stupid youtube documentary about the moon landing and then immediately afterwards declare only the smart people are capable of discussing it. Don't even speak to me on this topic until you get educated about it, child!
 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,557
Napoleon's rise and the Napoleonic era makes ZERO sense...Guilotines sound like a myth/scare-y booboo stuff. "We came up with this humane device and beheaded all the sassy french kangs and sassy clergy"...make it make sense, please.
“Hey look at this 5 foot dude who loves fucking stinky wenches, he’s your new ruler now, no dude he won a lottt of battles trust us!” and then he gets deposed to an island and comes back? Bad writing tbh…something out of a B action movie sequel. “Somehow…Napoleon returned.”
Why does George Washington look like a dopplegagger of King George III?
IMG_0730.jpeg

1719257257142.jpeg

Idk abt that one. I’m no phenology expert like you but they have pretty differing facial shapes / features. Washington looks like Liam Nieson…George III looks like Paul Giamatti, lol.
 

NoBacon

An honourable man.
Forum Clout
121,531
No i’m not a fucking drone who gets information from Youtube videos you fucking loser. I literally would have accepted a shady 2000’s era conspiracy website over this shit.

I’m prone to being a “conspiracist”. As you and I have talked about I believe in UFO’s. But the difference is is that my belief in them doesn’t come based on “feeling” or fucking retarded Youtube documentaries. It comes from sources. And when I read those sources I compare it to other information to see if it lines up, or what other people think about this information (after all, i’m not right in interpreting or understanding everything)

You watched this video and with 0 further thought just said “Yeah thats it, moons fake, moon landing never happened.”

You are literally a sheeple. The only difference is the herd you follow.

It fully sources everything in true autistic detail, fyi
 
Top