G
Guest
Guest
Stop letting bums decide elections and incentivising costly shit decisions to buy votes by appeasing losers.
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it.
Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source
You should have to contribute a certain amount into the system to obtain a vote
I maintain that there should be a compulsory 100 question test that you must score at least a 95% on, otherwise you're disqualified from voting
G
Guest
Guest
Asians like you too
Too easy to game that system, unfortunately. On top of that you might end up with a bunch of nerd technocrats in charge and I'd rather be ruled by Chef Libby tbh
We're quiet, industrious and integrate pretty well
Wrong
I wrote a whole post about it a year ago and can't be arsed to repeat it, but my idea was to have the test be paired with a load of other checks and balances, such as needing to be a property owner in order to be be eligible for voting. the vast majority of the population are simply too stupid to know what's best for them; we need to make it harder to vote, not easier
Most of the people who claim you need to provide something to society to vote would probably never meet these parameters
Like what do you think entitles YOU the right to vote? You’re white and pay taxes? Theres someone out there whiter who pays even more in taxes.
So actually you shouldn’t be able to vote and that guy should.
Like what do you think entitles YOU the right to vote? You’re white and pay taxes? Theres someone out there whiter who pays even more in taxes.
So actually you shouldn’t be able to vote and that guy should.
I think democracy is retarded in general but if we need to have it there should definitely be checks and balances. Member in good standing of an apostolic church, land owner, no felonies, above the age of 30, etc etc. I've just met a lot of dummies who are good at tests. I knew a guy who was a genius on paper but couldn't put together a computer without putting the color-coded IDE cables in the wrong slots.
I’ve said it before: Make it 2 questions.
1. Who is our current Vice President
2. What are the 3 branches of Government
If you can’t do either you should not be voting.
Btw, literal retarded people can vote. It makes no sense. Chef Adam Libby can fucking vote.
What makes you think we'd disagree with that?
Most criminals still think there should be laws, for example.
I meet my parameters, just because other people exceed it doesn't mean the parameters are stupid
"You think you want these rules for society but did it occur to you that YOU live in a society?!"
Fucking shitlibs @Sue Lightning
Fucking shitlibs @Sue Lightning
Because some people in favor of “You need to do X to vote” are only fine with the concept under the condition that THEY’d still be able to vote. They don’t realize they probably fit into the nondesirables, especially because the people crafting this would be “THEM” aka elitist jews who look down upon white men who provide to society
The specific example is Nobacon. He’s white and pays taxes. Who’s to say he’s included? He’s not married? He’s not voting. He pays taxes but doesn’t pay X in taxes? He’s not voting.
It's like eugenicists who think they wouldn't be wiped out. I'm only in favour of stopping eugenicists from breeding personally
G
Guest
Guest
I’m white, pay taxes, net contributor and keep healthy and save money. I have skin in the game because I do all the right things.
Thats basically my point. If you’re gonna do the “Only X people should vote” its better to stick to identity groups. How much you contribute to society is already factored into that: Only men should vote because they contribute more to society than women.
G
Guest
Guest
You have to go home, sir. I’m sorry.