• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

TRUMP TRIAL MEGATHREAD

Comment?


  • Total voters
    54

JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler

Grand Cyclops of the Digital Ku Klux Klan
Forum Clout
49,566
Sure, I'll admit he fucked a pornstar and paid her off to not talk about it then tried to hide it, but if that's illegal, what's next, free speech?!
basically he can fuck a whore, he can pay her to keep quiet, but it was the fact that he did that with campaign money and covered it up is the reason they charged him. It's a case of massively splitting hairs to go after a political enemy and only retarded faggots support trump's prosecution.
 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,677
basically he can fuck a whore, he can pay her to keep quiet, but it was the fact that he did that with campaign money and covered it up is the reason they charged him.
Yes because thats a crime.

And, most importantly, all the circumstances aligned. You had a DA willing to go after Trump. You had the evidence that lays out the case clearly. You have a clear crime to charge with.

Fuck Obama, fuck Bush, fuck Clinton, lets go back. If Ford never pardoned Nixon he would have faced charges. And people would be asking “Why did they only do this to Nixon?” Maybe it was because Nixon was the only one retarded enough to tape himself trying to cover up shit, then looked like a stubborn fool trying to cover up the recordings.

Look at how Hilary Clinton and Biden avoided prosecution. “Gee I don’t know how that got there its a mistake so its not a crime!!” (which itself creates lack of intent). And then Trump gets on a soap box of either bragging he did it or denying he did it at all.
 

JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler

Grand Cyclops of the Digital Ku Klux Klan
Forum Clout
49,566
Yes because thats a crime.

And, most importantly, all the circumstances aligned. You had a DA willing to go after Trump. You had the evidence that lays out the case clearly. You have a clear crime to charge with.

Fuck Obama, fuck Bush, fuck Clinton, lets go back. If Ford never pardoned Nixon he would have faced charges. And people would be asking “Why did they only do this to Nixon?” Maybe it was because Nixon was the only one retarded enough to tape himself trying to cover up shit, then looked like a stubborn fool trying to cover up the recordings.

Look at how Hilary Clinton and Biden avoided prosecution. “Gee I don’t know how that got there its a mistake so its not a crime!!” (which itself creates lack of intent). And then Trump gets on a soap box of either bragging he did it or denying he did it at all.
tl;dr.

you literally are only taking the side of "but its duh LAW!" because you hate trump. If it was anyone else you couldn't care less. It's ticky tack at best and a law that you either enforce across the board, or not at all.
 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,677
you literally are only taking the side of "but its duh LAW!" because you hate trump. If it was anyone else you couldn't care less. It's ticky tack at best and a law that you either enforce across the board, or not at all.
Look, theres my opinion and then what I think is objective reality. My opinion and objective reality is that Trump should be charged, because he did this. Someone like Bill Clinton? I would fucking love to see him in a prison cell. But the objective reality is it will never happen. And again, that goes back to the fact that Bill Clinton wasn’t retarded enough to do this out in the open where you could theoretically charge him - But we all know he did “it.” (you could seriously list like 10 things)
 

JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler

Grand Cyclops of the Digital Ku Klux Klan
Forum Clout
49,566
Look, theres my opinion and then what I think is objective reality. My opinion and objective reality is that Trump should be charged, because he did this. Someone like Bill Clinton? I would fucking love to see him in a prison cell. But the objective reality is it will never happen. And again, that goes back to the fact that Bill Clinton wasn’t retarded enough to do this out in the open where you could theoretically charge him - But we all know he did “it.” (you could seriously list like 10 things)
and the things he did were far worse, how can you not see how petty and politically motivated this is? It makes you look like a fucking retard to defend it vociferously. and I know if it were Clinton, or Biden or Obama you'd just be technicalityniggering in 10000 word posts about how it's wrong and anyone who thinks otherwise is dumb.
 

LockedHDD__Pot

Forum Clout
38,849
as an outsider who thinks most of politics is uniparty corrupt bullshit, what do you think should happen to Trump?

My thoughts: things are such corrupt bullshit that it was great that an idiot like Trump became president, it showed the facaad of the whole bullshit game. What kinda idiot would still trust the system after Trump was president? even though he's the only president who didn't start any new wars, which is good in my opinion.
 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,677
Then why does everyone know he slept with kids on child fuck island?
Lets use a different example with evidence that literally implicates him in a crime.

I have no doubt Clinton raped Juanita Bwoadwick. And I know there’s no shortage of Republican DA’s in Arkansas who’d love to charge him with that. But how? There’s no physical evidence. The statute of limitations is long passed, even after her accusation came to light (and even after it resurfaced in 2016). You have one persons word from 20 years ago.

Everyone knows he did it but it is quite literally impossible to charge him because you need evidence and to lay out the case.
 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,677
and I know if it were Clinton, or Biden or Obama you'd just be technicalityniggering in 10000 word posts about how it's wrong and anyone who thinks otherwise is dumb.
I am telling you, you are so wrong. If Trump wins in 2024 and decides to charge Biden over his classified documents you won’t hear a single “BUT…” from me. And i’d be cheering in the streets if they got Clinton.
 

JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler

Grand Cyclops of the Digital Ku Klux Klan
Forum Clout
49,566
I am telling you, you are so wrong. If Trump wins in 2024 and decides to charge Biden over his classified documents you won’t hear a single “BUT…” from me. And i’d be cheering in the streets if they got Clinton.
and that's admirable. but we're talking apples and oranges since one party is guilty of covering up some truly heinous shit and another paid a whore to keep her mouth shut and is only being charged because he rocked the boat too much.
 

JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler

Grand Cyclops of the Digital Ku Klux Klan
Forum Clout
49,566
Lets use a different example with evidence that literally implicates him in a crime.

I have no doubt Clinton raped Juanita Bwoadwick. And I know there’s no shortage of Republican DA’s in Arkansas who’d love to charge him with that. But how? There’s no physical evidence. The statute of limitations is long passed, even after her accusation came to light (and even after it resurfaced in 2016). You have one persons word from 20 years ago.

Everyone knows he did it but it is quite literally impossible to charge him because you need evidence and to lay out the case.
but what if, because they couldn't charge clinton with raping juanita, they instead put him on a microscope so they could rack up 3 dozen petty financial charges just to prosecute him out of spite? that's what they are doing here. Again you are comparing apples to oranges saying "I want clinton and biden charged with serious felonies so that makes prosecuting trump for petty bullshit ok" you are just making excuses for something you know isn't justifiable by pretending it's you wanting both sides held accountable
 

Sue2

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
123,677
but what if, because they couldn't charge clinton with raping juanita, they instead put him on a microscope so they could rack up 3 dozen petty financial charges just to prosecute him out of spite? that's what they are doing here.
That depends on if the charges have evidence to back them and if the sentence was constrained to those charges. If they want to charge Clinton for bad checks because he signed them, fine. But don’t give him 25 years for it because thats obviously not right, and obviously trying to make up for the rape shit.

I will bend the knee however on one point: The prosecution very obviously went into this guessing the underlying crime. In their opening statement it was more focused on “election influence” (??? So vague), then it became the election law shit, which is way more evident, but it’s obviously a means to an end. The easier and clean case is just saying he falsified the business records by labelling it as a retainer. Thats basically indisputable. But those are misdemeanors and result in fines. So they finagled it into a felony which, even if it IS a felony, I think its obvious why they did that. (Results in jail time)
 

LockedHDD__Pot

Forum Clout
38,849
I am telling you, you are so wrong. If Trump wins in 2024 and decides to charge Biden over his classified documents you won’t hear a single “BUT…” from me. And i’d be cheering in the streets if they got Clinton.
I picked a random comment to reply to, so no relevance but; why are you so into politics? you're a young guy, wtf? it's not like you're even being a revolutionary, you're just being like a voting grandma... have some more fun my dude
 
Top