• This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.

    Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.

    Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.

    If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.

    National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/

  • On 01-26-2021, Patrick S Tomlinson submitted a lawsuit, case number 2021CV000500 in Wisconsin. The address listed on the court website is 2316 North Oakland Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53211 US

    This lawsuit claimed multiple torts. One of which was that a book review quoted as "John Doe 11 posting as 'barfyman362': "Not good...Just not good."

    As stated on page 3 of the complaint. This was brought by Minc Law "NOW COMES the Plaintiff Patrick S. Tomlinson ("Plaintiff") by his atorneys, Axley Brynelson, LLP and Minc Law," Specifically Brinton J Resto.

    The Complaint authored by Brinton J Resto's stated verbatim, "Upon information and belief, Defendants John Does 1-60 ("Defendants") are individuals who anonymously authored and published false and defamatory statements regarding Plaintiff"

    As per Minc Law's website

    • https://www.minclaw.com/wisconsin-defamation-law-state-guide/

    • Opinion refers to statements and communications which are unable to be independently verified as fact or fiction, and relied on by defamation defendants in the United States and Wisconsin.

    • After a performer emailed her customer to complain about her performance being posted and shared online, the customer distributed the performer’s email among its community, along with a notation characterizing it as “overzealous,” “litigious” and “heavy-handed.” The court held that such characterizations merely expressed the author’s opinion about the email and was thus not defamatory.

    • This page has been peer-reviewed, fact-checked, and edited by multiple qualified attorneys and legal professionals to ensure substantive accuracy and coverage. Our publication process is robust, following a 16-step content creation and review process.

    Mr Resto, who does in fact hold a law degree (I’m as shocked as you, but I doubled checked). Decided that statement Not good...Just not good was in fact defamatory per Wisconsin law.

    Yes that’s the very same Brinton J. Resto who joined The Calkins Law Firm in July of 2022.

    By dismissing this notice you accept these factual statements.

This is just sad.


Sue Lightning

It's not new. He's been trying to go viral with this nonsense for years.

@Gronez_Bambatta please kill yourself immediately for liking that tweet.
I love how everytime someone brings up Doug Bell the immediate reaction is someone thinking its new then finding out he’s been doing it for years. The character is so irrelevant and unfunny even us who are supposed to keep up to date on the unfunny nonsense these fucks put out couldnt even be bothered.


For someone who made it their livelihood, worm never did understand comedy, did he?
Man, this is a really good comment. Because even when he was funny he rarely understood exactly why. He would often think that the most perverted aspects of his character were the funniest, and sometimes they were, but because of the absurdity. Not the perversion.

This is why he thrives when he is surrounded by other people who are also funny. He can’t carry anything on his own. For example, he’s a terrible writer. He’s best going back-and-forth with other comics, Anthony, etc. He’s incapable of being funny in a straight line.
I love how everytime someone brings up Doug Bell the immediate reaction is someone thinking its new then finding out he’s been doing it for years. The character is so irrelevant and unfunny even us who are supposed to keep up to date on the unfunny nonsense these fucks put out couldnt even be bothered.
Worth remembering that Norton blamed OpieRadio for less and less people showing up to his shows and watching his videos. I guess time makes fools.of us all ehh Jim?


Did not marry a tranny
He said on da show a lot that South Park could get away with crass things because it was a cartoon. He thought that's what made the South Park formula work. So he does that Chip Cartoon. Amy Schumer doesn't know what funny is because everything is just written for her, and Gilbert must have needed the money, but fuck you know Gilbert knew it was awful.

Norton's standup wasn't good and I couldn't get through even a single chapter of his book. But he was very fast when other, funnier people were around.

To really beat a dead horse into the ground, has he had one funny line on Jim & Sam?

Just one punchline....one punchline. Just one punchline....
Last edited: