The king of England and his brother the prince were best friends with Britain and America’s biggest ever pedophiles respectively.

[Suetonius]

Doesn't surprise me that Charles did it. He's got pretensions of intellectualism and is an arrogant sod. Letting him into Cambridge was a huge mistake. He'll do it again. I'd be very surprised to learn that his mother ever directly crossed that line. She understood the role perhaps better than any of her predecessors.

I’m not an expert on Britain so I guess I want your take. It feels to me as an outsider this Charles faggot will be the last of the royal family. People put up with Elizabeth because she was so well respected and around for so long. This faggot is an arrogant idiot and won’t last long in the job anyway, so then that bald faggot William takes over? And that’ll restore faith in the monarchy? What about the guy after him? It seems like the whole system is coming to an end .

 

[Suetonius]

Either way I don’t think it’s fair to hold the Brits responsible for their monarchy. I mean literally what else can they do besides a bloody revolution, which as we know is OUR thing. What we should hold them responsible for is actually electing a streetshitter as PM.

 

[Guest]

The royal family is stupid but theres no solution. They have billions in wealth and would never give it up, and implicit power being head of the commonwealth even if they can’t actually do something. But what other identity do the Brits have at this point?

And I mean that genuinely. If they got rid of the monarchy they’d be another limey US puppet state like Australia - Aka literally just the US but everyone has accents.

I’m pretty sure none of the FTSE 100 are tech companies, the largest British companies are archaic dying industries like oil and British tobacco.

They left the EU and the single market for some reason (take back control of our destiny is the only reason I’ve heard from someone, whatever that means), the economy is doomed, they’re importing hostile alien influences.

It’s the embers of an empire and it’s not a better end than the US will get.

 

[guest]

I’m sorry to burst your bubble but she absolutely did. She had weekly chats with every prime minister for decades, do you think they just spoke about the weather or for friendly advice?

If the bar for being a great queen is not being a pedophile fuck up and waving silently, I don’t know what to tell you,

You're a funny boy. I suppose you were privy to the weekly Audiences?

 

[Guest]

You're a funny boy. I suppose you were privy to the weekly Audiences?

>queen of England is worth billions and has vast resources and influence
>speaks to prime minister every week all her life in private off the record

“Old boy, how dare you say she had any influence over policy!”

You’re not that naive my dude.

 

[guest]

I’m not an expert on Britain so I guess I want your take. It feels to me as an outsider this Charles faggot will be the last of the royal family. People put up with Elizabeth because she was so well respected and around for so long. This faggot is an arrogant idiot and won’t last long in the job anyway, so then that bald faggot William takes over? And that’ll restore faith in the monarchy? What about the guy after him? It seems like the whole system is coming to an end .

It seems that way. William is "woke" too and the average Middle Englander, die-hard monarchist is decidedly not. It'll be interesting.

 

[guest]

>queen of England is worth billions and has vast resources and influence
>speaks to prime minister every week all her life in private off the record

“Old boy, how dare you say she had any influence over policy!”

You’re not that naive my dude.

The PM's interests are the government's interests which are the Royal family's interests which are the interests of the state and establishment. The only interest of the people they place any importance on is enough security and prosperity to keep the populace content and not rioting. This is the same everywhere that stops short of full out police-state authoritarianism. I don't really have faith in any system of government, it's up to the individual to look after themselves and decide which rules they will and won't follow, and to accept the consequences of those decisions.

 

[Guest]

The PM's interests are the government's interests which are the Royal family's interests which are the interests of the state and establishment. The only interest of the people they place any importance on is enough security and prosperity to keep the populace content and not rioting. This is the same everywhere that stops short of full out police-state authoritarianism. I don't really have faith in any system of government, it's up to the individual to look after themselves and decide which rules they will and won't follow, and to accept the consequences of those decisions.

 

[Dog Eater]

Has this ever happened or is it one of those archaic laws that are never implemented, like execution for treason or burning HRH's shipyards?

Palace letters - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Guest]

[URL unfurl="true"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palace_letters[/URL]

She also paid off her sons underage sex trafficking victims and for the press to not cover William’s extra martial affairs and to instead cover Meghan Markle’s heinous crimes of *check notes* holding hands with her husband in public.

Fuck these people.

 

[guest]

[URL unfurl="true"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palace_letters[/URL]

Sometimes Colonials need to be saved from themselves

 

[TheUserRedditBanned]

The weirdest thing about this is he's the figurehead of a religion he doesn't believe in; he's a closet Muslim. (Of course, Tony Blair appointed all the CofE Bishops for years while being a closet Catholic, so...shrug?)

 

[Guest]

The weirdest thing about this is he's the figurehead of a religion he doesn't believe in; he's a closet Muslim. (Of course, Tony Blair appointed all the CofE Bishops for years while being a closet Catholic, so...shrug?)

None of that stands up to any level of scrutiny, the queen was supposedly hyper religious but her religion is explicitly clear there are no kings or queens of men and He is the King of all.

It’s like how people want to get married in a ceremony under the eyes of a God they don’t believe in, in churches they don’t attend or fund which are for people they consider beneath them, why do it?

Nothing makes sense, nothing is certain other than Andrew and Charles are inbred pedophiles

 

[Dennyislife]

I’m not an expert on Britain so I guess I want your take. It feels to me as an outsider this Charles faggot will be the last of the royal family. People put up with Elizabeth because she was so well respected and around for so long. This faggot is an arrogant idiot and won’t last long in the job anyway, so then that bald faggot William takes over? And that’ll restore faith in the monarchy? What about the guy after him? It seems like the whole system is coming to an end .

There's no agreed replacement system and the crown estate, where they get their money from, is owned by the government and makes more money for the country as a old king handed if over. Splitting those up would be a pain for sure even if I am a complete republican and think it's embarrassing.

I don't fully buy the tourist money argument. Legoland is in the same town as Windsor castle and gets far more visitors a year and is even far more expensive to get in.

 

[aRTie02150]

Don't think I've ever heard anyone say they like Charles. "Mopey cunt" is about the nicest thing you'll hear said about him.

They make fun of his appearance here in America.

Big eared doofus looking old fag

 

[Dennyislife]

They make fun of his appearance here in America.

Big eared doofus looking old fag

Yeah there's absolutely no piss taking in England and it's all treated with the same retarded reverence as Americans have for a flag

 

[LingerLonger]

There's no agreed replacement system and the crown estate, where they get their money from, is owned by the government and makes more money for the country as a old king handed if over. Splitting those up would be a pain for sure even if I am a complete republican and think it's embarrassing.

Part of their money is also a lack of taxes. If they receive $10million from some source whether it is laundered money, from taxpayers, selling off a castle, or whatever. They are keeping nearly all of it. Same with the Biden family, Clintons, Trumps, and so on. Avoiding taxes at their income level is basically like having an additional two or three massive sources of income. When Biden is taking his 10% cut for the 'big man' or Hunter Biden is raking in $50million in consulting fees that money is going into some LLC or trust that is immune to the IRS probing it. Though with the level of corruption nowadays they probably just deposit the money into their own accounts under their own names at this point.

And even their laundering operations are immune from scrutiny. Where did Epstein get all of his money? Everyone knows it was dirty Mossad financing. But the governments still act like he was some big legitimate businessman. When Obama laundered money through his scam book deals or corporate speaking appearances he didn't need to worry about some IRS or FBI probe like a random criminal would.

Anyone want to guess how much money Bill and Hilary have reportedly made from speaking fees? Over $150million. That doesn't count book deals and corporate speaking events that are not recorded publicly.

 

[LoomisBuckby]

Brits think that’s just great and worship them and put their faces on their currency and bow to them.

Pedarasty is literally a part of English culture. They've used it for years to keep everyone in line.
Same shit in the USA with the old timey Ivy League fraternities. They all brought it over from England.