Reminder to any brother men with investments.

[MYTHCHILD]

State funded social spending is not directly included in GDP (services are so you could include Medicare and Medicaid, which are definitely 'welfare'). The goods or services purchased with welfare are included.

GDP is just one indicator and has its flaws but probably not the flaws you're thinking of. GDP numbers for Q2 have actually been revised upward, which is great but we're only halfway through May.

GDP slowing is definitely not the sign of a healthy economy, especially when you combine that with inflation (those numbers just came out and were flat, we'll wait on what revisions say).

I’m getting my forum lore muddled but you have an economics degree or something? I’m not disputing the finer points of economic theory, I’m saying economic theory is an asinine and pointless metric of societal wellbeing.

I don’t care if we had a roaring economy on some nerds spreadsheets if we are majority black and nobody goes to church and women aren’t free or safe. What was once an option, a dual income household, is now a necessity, it doesn’t matter what the numbers say, that’s not progress because of Jewish daycare for women’s non jobs to double the tax base and stop white children being bred.

You can’t see the wood for the trees.

 

[BakersfieldChimp]

I’m saying economic theory is an asinine and pointless metric of societal wellbeing.

This is the main negative against GDP actually and I mostly agree with everything you're saying here.

Edit: but GDP is one metric that goes into the larger health of the economy. If you've got a better metric or formula I'd love to hear it.

 

[MYTHCHILD]

This is the main negative against GDP actually and I mostly agree with everything you're saying here.

My friend lives in Poland, and yeah he’s “poor” - I don’t remember the numbers but I think the average salary is like 20K USD - but he lives in a nice house, in a safe area, which is Christian and homogenous. Are we really better in nigger crime town USA with open borders becoming a huge Indian slum because we have high salaries we can use to buy cheap Chinese crap? Absolutely not.

That’s what the tariffs stuff is about, it must happen, even if it’s impotently raging against the dying of the light of the globalist nightmare future.

 

[BakersfieldChimp]

That’s what the tariffs stuff is about, it must happen, even if it’s impotently raging against the dying of the light of the globalist nightmare future.

The fear is that the opposite happens. What if we make less and pay more for everything? We aren't getting rid of the niggers (I think my stance on immigration, particularly jeet immigration is well known here) so that is what it is.

I know you don't believe in the 'science' of economics but it's at least a model(s) to try and explain or predict and there's no historical record of tariffs working the way we're hoping they will (again, McKinley era they worked to a degree but we were exporting more than importing then). 10% blanket tariffs are simply too high. Target specific industries, goods, or services and we'd be in better shape.

 

[MYTHCHILD]

The fear is that the opposite happens. What if we make less and pay more for everything? We aren't getting rid of the niggers (I think my stance on immigration, particularly jeet immigration is well known here) so that is what it is.

I know you don't believe in the 'science' of economics but it's at least a model(s) to try and explain or predict and there's no historical record of tariffs working the way we're hoping they will (again, McKinley era they worked to a degree but we were exporting more than importing then). 10% blanket tariffs are simply too high. Target specific industries, goods, or services and we'd be in better shape.

They’re a tool in a big tool box of weapons to altar the status quo.

 

[Rude AND rude!]

The fear is that the opposite happens. What if we make less and pay more for everything? We aren't getting rid of the niggers (I think my stance on immigration, particularly jeet immigration is well known here) so that is what it is.

I know you don't believe in the 'science' of economics but it's at least a model(s) to try and explain or predict and there's no historical record of tariffs working the way we're hoping they will (again, McKinley era they worked to a degree but we were exporting more than importing then). 10% blanket tariffs are simply too high. Target specific industries, goods, or services and we'd be in better shape.

Exports/imports, who has time? All I need is my lunch pale with a full thermos of black coffee. Right guys.

 

[BakersfieldChimp]

They’re a tool in a big tool box of weapons to altar the status quo.

What are the other tools?

 

[MYTHCHILD]

What are the other tools?

Ovens

 

[BakersfieldChimp]

Ovens

Do jeets smell like curry when you cook them?

 

[Turd Glider]

Globalism rules. MAGA is fairytale horse shit. Enjoy the coal mines, coal burners.