- Forum Clout
- 41,817
I wonder what Resto's win rate is when people actually contest.
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Reminder: Resto and Mayr's Incompetence lead to specific instances of Pat owing more money
G
guest
Guest
You can take it as many times as you want. The results aren't public but if you check the date of his JD and compare to his bar number or his esquire date you can determine how many attempts he made.
So if he graduated in 2005 and didn't practice until 2007 he probably had 3 or 4 failures. There's two test per year in California.
- Forum Clout
- 51,107
I suspect zero. I Googled his name once and found comments on websites that were years old where he replied to someone saying that he was retained as counsel to a person being disparaged in the comment, and he instructed the person to remove that comment. Years later, they had not. He's all bark and no bite.
Last edited:
Don’t feel bad. A lot of people here including me thought Anthony was straight, Opie was a semi decent broadcaster and Jimmy was funny for years.
Pat is very fat and we all make mistakes is what I’m getting at.
- Forum Clout
- 51,107
AIIIIIIIIIIDDDDDDS
- Forum Clout
- 76,242
Fawk that’s hilarious! Are you a comic??
G
guest
Guest
Nicole spent an hour painting her nails and it was better money invested in the case than anything Brinton has done so far.
- Forum Clout
- 41,817
That definitely makes the company look good, having some rebuttal to a negative review that does not address any of the customer complaints and just says "we will sue you".
- Forum Clout
- 51,107
His whole field of "law" is just SLAAP bullshit. It's all about scaring people into taking shit down. For every successful internet defamation suit, there's a million comments that aren't going anywhere. It's such a toothless threat.
- Forum Clout
- 33,432
I like them even more now that they cost Piggy some righteous bucks
- Forum Clout
- 268,520
Im guessing pat will bury his head in the sand and refuse payment until collections are serving papers.
G
guest
Guest
Listening to it again, based judge Schulman is so no-nosense. Pretty much saying Stav is retarded.
Stein was good too, apart from the sanctions part.
I love the fact that a Democrat judge in liberal Cali completely destroyed pats stupid case.
Stein was good too, apart from the sanctions part.
I love the fact that a Democrat judge in liberal Cali completely destroyed pats stupid case.
- Forum Clout
- 8,005
many such cases
- Forum Clout
- 22,495
I believe in the past you've also mentioned listing Quasi as Doe No. 1 - meaning he gets Krinsky protection unless Pat can prove he said something defamatory (which he hadn't) - as a mistake; as well as Brinton including screenshots in one of their sworn declarations that could only have been obtained illegally (which would have come up if it came to actual court). And why the fuck did he launch the case in Wisconsin, claiming that most of the defendants lived there, when its obvious that we don't and that all of the action is in California? Why fight that unnecessary battle, other than to line Brinton's pockets as (unlike California) he's able to appear in Wisconsin?
I think at the very least Patrick should put in a couple of complaints with the appropriate bar associations. At least that way he'll have the satisfaction of seeing professional sanctions applied; maybe even get some of his money back.
I think at the very least Patrick should put in a couple of complaints with the appropriate bar associations. At least that way he'll have the satisfaction of seeing professional sanctions applied; maybe even get some of his money back.
Last edited:
- Forum Clout
- 20,814
The more I think about it the more I think Pat probably won't go too far with the malpractice angle. The only way that angle can work is if he accepts his lawsuit was a dud from the beginning. You can't argue that it was a brilliant strategy and expect to win a malpractice suit. However I think he pushed his lawyers to go with this angle, and not the other way around.
- Forum Clout
- 22,495
Shut up and do the bit.
- Forum Clout
- 1,552
Are you insane? 60 of us almost got our asses cuffed-N-stuffed then tossed in the slammer for felony fat shaming that tub of shit.
- Forum Clout
- 21,344
Thank you @notalawyer . If you someday take an interest in a legal career I think you’d be great at it. Handsome, smart, and a Patposter? You’re treading on Peña ground!They are claiming tortious interference. This has been litigated already and laughed out of court.
1. Tomlinson doesn't have a business relationship with twitter
2. Even if he did, its not a tort to report actual violations.
3. Even if it were, he can't prove who submitted which reports.
Notifying Twitter of TOS Violations Isn't Tortious Interference-Illoominate v. CAIR - Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Wikipedia describes Laura Loomer as a “conspiracy theorist.” Twitter banned her in 2018. I previously blogged on Loomer’s unsuccessful antitrust case against Twitter and other social media platforms. In this lawsuit, she seeks to hold CAIR responsible for her Twitter...blog.ericgoldman.org
- Notacarol
- Forum Clout
- 51,107
But we could have more.