Nice retraction, stupid

[analeggsalad]

That’s great and all but Shane was undone by a clip from his podcast not some amazing undercover journalism from Seth. I don’t see how he can get anything from this other than some satisfaction.

I personally gain pleasure seeing Seth's career become tainted and experience IRL humiliation and torment, it's bigger than Shane. That said, Je suis Shane

And it wasn't just "It's shane's fault for saying those things", that's the BLM take. it was Seth with his Jewish MSM platform that put it up front at the worst time. It could have been ridden out or apologized for if dug up later. If you read this, Simons is aware of the importance of "legit" publications and the influence they wield, and he used them deliberately to attack Shane and pressure networks/advertisers to drop him bc "you wouldn't support a White Supremist, would you?"

It's the same thing Joe Bernstein did to Sam Hyde

 

[guest]

I personally gain pleasure seeing Seth's career become tainted and experience IRL humiliation and torment, it's bigger than Shane. That said, [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Je_suis_Charlie']Je suis Shane[/URL]

And it wasn't just "It's shane's fault for saying those things", that's the BLM take. it was Seth with his Jewish MSM platform that put it up front at the worst time. It could have been ridden out or apologized for if dug up later. If you read this, Simons is aware of the importance of "legit" publications and the influence they wield, and he used them deliberately to attack Shane and pressure networks/advertisers to drop him bc "you wouldn't support a White Supremist, would you?"

It's the same thing Joe Bernstein did to Sam Hyde

Yeah of course, I’m not saying Shane did anything wrong at all, I just mean Seth shouldn’t really get any credit for “journalism”. He didn’t really do shit other than show people a podcast that was available to the public. It just blew up in spite of him, not because he did a great job.

And people saying Shane should sue him are being stupid.

 

[analeggsalad]

Yeah of course, I’m not saying Shane did anything wrong at all, I just mean Seth shouldn’t really get any credit for “journalism”. He didn’t really do shit other than show people a podcast that was available to the public. It just blew up in spite of him, not because he did a great job.

Seth Simons

All stories by Seth Simons

slate.com

Out of nowhere, with no prior pieces on that website, Seth shows up with yet anohter outlet for his Shane hit piece. How is he just showing up on these leftist liberal websies like that? There were other sites too at that time, it's on his muckracker profile. Vice.com is another one.

Seth Simons

www.vice.com

It's stretching credulity to claim that he didn't have similar manipulative, smug, predatorial conversations as he had with SpaceEdge with other (((people))) over at slate and vice.

it didn't "blow up" in spite of him, it blew up because there were other left leaning people and media Jews who were sympathetic to his cause, wanted to ruin a racizt nazi Trump guy, and gave a megaphone to his hit piece to achieve that end

 

[guest]

[URL unfurl="true"]https://slate.com/author/seth-simons[/URL]

Out of nowhere, with no prior pieces on that website, Seth shows up with yet anohter outlet for his Shane hit piece. How is he just showing up on these leftist liberal websies like that? There were other sites too at that time, it's on his muckracker profile. Vice.com is another one.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.vice.com/en/contributor/seth-simons[/URL]

It's stretching credulity to claim that he didn't have similar manipulative, smug, predatorial conversations as he had with SpaceEdge with other (((people))) over at slate and vice.

it didn't "blow up" in spite of him, it blew up because there were other left leaning people and media Jews who were sympathetic to his cause, wanted to ruin a racizt nazi Trump guy, and gave a megaphone to his hit piece to achieve that end

Yes we’re on the same page here. Seth didn’t really do anything. He’s not talented, he’s not a good journalist. His part in that situation could have been any one of 10,000 other people. He’s insignificant.

 

[analeggsalad]

Yes we’re on the same page here. Seth didn’t really do anything. He’s not talented, he’s not a good journalist. His part in that situation could have been any one of 10,000 other people. He’s insignificant.

No he's not.

His muckracker profile shows that after a failed attempt in comedy he's dedicating what he wished were positive creative energy into attacking the successful people in the field who made him feel like a failure

Muck Rack | For journalists and public relations

Find Seth Simons's articles, email address, contact information, Twitter and more

muckrack.com

As long as he has access to publications that are significant enough to persuade venue holders or tv networks (which he does) he is on course to be coRRRREcted. Your comments are a cope or a deceptive misdirection

 

[Raymond]

No he's not.

His muckracker profile shows that after a failed attempt in comedy he's dedicating what he wished were positive creative energy into attacking the successful people in the field who made him feel like a failure

Muck Rack | For journalists and public relations

Find Seth Simons's articles, email address, contact information, Twitter and more

muckrack.com

As long as he has access to publications that are significant enough to persuade venue holders or tv networks (which he does) he is on course to be coRRRREcted. Your comments are a cope or a deceptive misdirection

I never make it beyond one paragraph of this fucking rat's writing.

 

[JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler]

Oh fuck yeah! I used to love this site!

homstahwuhnnerdotcohlm