-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it.
Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source
Are there? I wasn't aware the injuns were conducting census counts in the 1600s.
G
guest
Guest
I don't know but I'm sure a bunch of rich suburban cunts are going to scream at the top of their lungs how it's America's duty to save these poor people!!
As long as they don't go into their neighborhoods, of course...
So how many were there again? You and everyone else have no clue. From Stanford - https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/2182945
Lol there were definitely way more injuns in the 1600’s than now. It’s not even anything you need a source for it’s just basic logic.
Injun land then
Injun land now
The only way the Injun population could have increased is through every population increasing over time and the fact that there was a good 100 years where we stopped killing them.
Injun land then
Injun land now
The only way the Injun population could have increased is through every population increasing over time and the fact that there was a good 100 years where we stopped killing them.
I was taught that diseases unknown to the red man spread westward during the 16th-17 C, preceding Whitey's actual presence and killing millions.
Jordan Peterson is on his way to Israel right now
The victors write the history books, stupid.
I mean its possible but usually unknown diseases are spread by foreign populations. It happened yugely when the white man landed in America and it happened to the Europeans whenever they tried to travel into Africa.
I'd give her bunghole a good rogering if you know what I mean
"No one has a clue."
No, we do have clues. Historical records, ethnographic data, and archaeological evidence. We also have historical records on how many were killed by colonists and Americans.
It's good that you cited that retarded claim of 112 million because it's largely unsupported. There are other claims of 54 and 1-2 million. Guess which claim has the most evidence?
Using Stanford for an appeal to authority is literally proving the meme I just posted. Ah yes, STANFORD isn't kiked out, because they're picky and expensive
The funny thing is that that's not even evidence. That's Bill Denevan saying "Some people said ______." CNN tier "academic work."
Babe, please be quiet. The men are talking.
Happened a lot less than the kikes told us. Alt Hype did an incredible takedown of ((("Guns, Germs, and Steel")))
"A strong border is equivalent to genocide."Ben Shapiro shows his true colors more every day. Basically because Tucker Carlson pointed out that American politicians don't scream about our border like they do Israel's, Ben says that he'll agree with that if we agree with him that Palestine needs to be wiped off the planet.
Azzmador on Gab: 'Shapiro goes full "OY GEVALT FUCK THESE GOYIM" mo…'
Azzmador on Gab: 'Shapiro goes full "OY GEVALT FUCK THESE GOYIM" mode.'gab.com
Typical with these people
Hey, bald guy.. it also says it could have been as low as 8 million. Point is we have no fucking clue the total because they were tribal and didn't do yearly scalp counts. Are you retarded?
Tribes that had contact with whitey spread it to tribes further inland that had none and so on. That's what I meant. The same thing would've happened if the Ottomans or the Chinese reached N. America first.
You're both right. You're right about what Shapiro said. Imager is right about what Shapiro meant.
Last edited:
>Bald
Hey, skinny brown man with long thumbs..
"Bill Denevan said that other people said 8 million. Therefore no other estimates or mentions of estimates exist."
Also you:
"No one has a clue."
Me, an academic: "Yes, we do, and here are some of them."
You: "We have no clue"
Question, are you jewish?