G
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it.
Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source
Is Trump trying to throw the election?
- Thread starter BoringFaggot
- Start date
We're all gonna have a big laugh come election time.
I can't wait. I even bookmarked some stuff!
I can't wait. I even bookmarked some stuff!
Also this is wrong because Biden wasn’t even the nominee when they debated. The rules for both of the debates do not specify which candidates would appear and only outlines their eligibility. RFK if he met these requirements (lol) could have appeared.
Arguing about Trump in 2024 is absurd. Everything is baked and everyone already has their opinion.
The notion of POTUS just being a figurehead is interesting and I understand the temptation to say a president isn't powerful, but it seems they can move the needle (probably too much) as far as foreign policy.
If Al Gore won, would we have invaded Iraq? That's a wild amount of power based on who was the "figurehead" at the time
The notion of POTUS just being a figurehead is interesting and I understand the temptation to say a president isn't powerful, but it seems they can move the needle (probably too much) as far as foreign policy.
If Al Gore won, would we have invaded Iraq? That's a wild amount of power based on who was the "figurehead" at the time
People speculated on Trump "throwing" the election in 2016 and again in 2020. He was doing no such thing, nor is he now. His main problem right now is how he assumed he'd cruise into fall doing his regular shtick, and goofing on Sleepy Joe's senile antics. Now he has to come up with some new material at the worst time, and it's throwing him off his game. But it's only August, and who the fuck knows what'll happen between now and November.
I'll take Words @Sue Lightning never heard for $1000
concise
brief
terse
pithy
laconic
compendious
epigrammatic
summary
aphoristic
condensed
apothegmatic
to the point
short and sweet
boiled down
in a nutshell
in a few well-chosen words
Hey ya never know, he might beat her... but as you said the office doesn't matter so it wont matter either way will it? Lol
Why is the guy who talks to crows smarter than all the zoomers in this thread COMBINED?
Trump will win if he energizes the public enough to turnout and overpower the riggers and propaganda against him.
You know what dude!? You type your sentence, you make it brief, BOOM, you're not a gay guy.
This is the most correct answer in this thread. His campaign managers were specifically hired to craft the message towards Biden, and a lot of that messaging had to do with his health or family and his policies were secondary. Now they have Kamala and can try to pin Bidens policies on her but are sorta lost on character attacks, especially attacks as effective as Bidens age or creepiness was.
Kamala is tied in the polling but she could pick Jim Norton as her VP and go back to losing how Biden was post debate. Nothing ever happens…
Except for the one fact that the majority of people don't own property, which is partly to blame on the same two Parties they keep voting for, and don't give a shit if anyone else has to pay property tax...
What the hell are you talking about?
Not talking to you.
“I don’t get it. Why don’t 50% of Americans split their vote to a third party thats never won an election, who’s candidates are utter dog shit and inexperienced, have wacky outsider policy goals, and who’s platform is extremely specific and not appealing to a wide range of people?”
Seriously, do you not live in America?
Seriously, do you not live in America?
"They should stick to the same parties with the same dog shit candidates that have given them all the shit they bitch and complain about on a daily basis"
That does sound like the America i live in, sure...
Why are the crows smarter than all the zoomers in this thread COMBINED?
Now go look at what data they use to come up with that number and get back to me
I have to dig into your brain as to how you came to this retarded conclusion. So people who own property vote third party because the third parties propose no property tax.Now go look at what data they use to come up with that number and get back to me
Have you considered that one of the other two parties may propose lowering property taxes AND other policy measures they support, which automatically outranks the single issue of “no tax”, something that could never be accomplished anyway.
And then they vote for one of the two because they actually like winning elections.
Why are you coming up with shit i didn't say?
Let them win all the elections they want, i don't give a shit, they'll blame everyone but themselves when the entire nation collapses and they're starving in the streets anyways.