• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Is Trump trying to throw the election?

NoBacon

An honourable man.
Forum Clout
120,910
IMG_5629.jpeg
 

The Sue Deal

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
122,881
He's going to debate her. She just got the nomination a few days ago, there was never a reason to schedule one until there was an official nominee.
Also this is wrong because Biden wasn’t even the nominee when they debated. The rules for both of the debates do not specify which candidates would appear and only outlines their eligibility. RFK if he met these requirements (lol) could have appeared.
 

Mick_Mickerson

Which way?! Medium or well done?
Forum Clout
17,740
Arguing about Trump in 2024 is absurd. Everything is baked and everyone already has their opinion.

The notion of POTUS just being a figurehead is interesting and I understand the temptation to say a president isn't powerful, but it seems they can move the needle (probably too much) as far as foreign policy.

If Al Gore won, would we have invaded Iraq? That's a wild amount of power based on who was the "figurehead" at the time
 
Forum Clout
55,726
People speculated on Trump "throwing" the election in 2016 and again in 2020. He was doing no such thing, nor is he now. His main problem right now is how he assumed he'd cruise into fall doing his regular shtick, and goofing on Sleepy Joe's senile antics. Now he has to come up with some new material at the worst time, and it's throwing him off his game. But it's only August, and who the fuck knows what'll happen between now and November.
 

JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS

DMANIAC
Forum Clout
51,715
Why would I be offended by someone who doesn't know what they're talking about?

I can understand why people can get upset with Trump and the Republicans but the older you get the more you see it for what it is, an act.

The thing about Democrats is they treat people like they're idiots with their act. It's similar to the concept of Santa Clause.

When you're in your 30s and have your own place and pay property and other taxes you'll think differently. I promise.
Why is the guy who talks to crows smarter than all the zoomers in this thread COMBINED?
 

PickleRickle

You are not a glowie. You are just stupid.
Forum Clout
46,437
Again, you’re talking about who will win a US election. This can not be boiled down to a couple sentences unless you want to look like a reductive overconfident blowhard retard, like you are right now.
Trump will win if he energizes the public enough to turnout and overpower the riggers and propaganda against him.

You know what dude!? You type your sentence, you make it brief, BOOM, you're not a gay guy.
 

The Sue Deal

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
122,881
People speculated on Trump "throwing" the election in 2016 and again in 2020. He was doing no such thing, nor is he now. His main problem right now is how he assumed he'd cruise into fall doing his regular shtick, and goofing on Sleepy Joe's senile antics. Now he has to come up with some new material at the worst time, and it's throwing him off his game. But it's only August, and who the fuck knows what'll happen between now and November.
This is the most correct answer in this thread. His campaign managers were specifically hired to craft the message towards Biden, and a lot of that messaging had to do with his health or family and his policies were secondary. Now they have Kamala and can try to pin Bidens policies on her but are sorta lost on character attacks, especially attacks as effective as Bidens age or creepiness was.

Kamala is tied in the polling but she could pick Jim Norton as her VP and go back to losing how Biden was post debate. Nothing ever happens…
 

The Sue Deal

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
122,881
Except for the one fact that the majority of people don't own property, which is partly to blame on the same two Parties they keep voting for, and don't give a shit if anyone else has to pay property tax...
What the hell are you talking about?
 

The Sue Deal

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
122,881
“I don’t get it. Why don’t 50% of Americans split their vote to a third party thats never won an election, who’s candidates are utter dog shit and inexperienced, have wacky outsider policy goals, and who’s platform is extremely specific and not appealing to a wide range of people?”

Seriously, do you not live in America?
 

BoringFaggot

AKA HomeRunCumia
Forum Clout
20,627
“I don’t get it. Why don’t 50% of Americans split their vote to a third party thats never won an election, who’s candidates are utter dog shit and inexperienced, have wacky outsider policy goals, and who’s platform is extremely specific and not appealing to a wide range of people?”

Seriously, do you not live in America?
"They should stick to the same parties with the same dog shit candidates that have given them all the shit they bitch and complain about on a daily basis"


That does sound like the America i live in, sure...
 

The Sue Deal

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
122,881
IMG_2617.jpeg

Fucking retard, you need to kill yourself now. Why aren’t these 60% of people voting third party? I mean, they own property!
 

The Sue Deal

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
122,881
Now go look at what data they use to come up with that number and get back to me 😁
I have to dig into your brain as to how you came to this retarded conclusion. So people who own property vote third party because the third parties propose no property tax.

Have you considered that one of the other two parties may propose lowering property taxes AND other policy measures they support, which automatically outranks the single issue of “no tax”, something that could never be accomplished anyway.

And then they vote for one of the two because they actually like winning elections.
 

BoringFaggot

AKA HomeRunCumia
Forum Clout
20,627
I have to dig into your brain as to how you came to this retarded conclusion. So people who own property vote third party because the third parties propose no property tax.

Have you considered that one of the other two parties may propose lowering property taxes AND other policy measures they support, which automatically outranks the single issue of “no tax”, something that could never be accomplished anyway.

And then they vote for one of the two because they actually like winning elections.
Why are you coming up with shit i didn't say?


Let them win all the elections they want, i don't give a shit, they'll blame everyone but themselves when the entire nation collapses and they're starving in the streets anyways.
 
Top