- Forum Clout
- 7,171
There is no debt, stlaker
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
I still think it could be former leadership who don't want Pat's finances looked into.It’s not fucking SFWA. They don’t have the money to just be paying off shit like that and no way that many timid nerds are putting their necks on the line to protect the last group of leaders who would have started all this shit. It’s totally different people in charge now.
There is a major scandal waiting. I will enjoy what happens neCKSTI still think it could be former leadership who don't want Pat's finances looked into.
I can see why current SFWA leadership want nothing to do with this but the people who were in charge when this little fiasco started? From the sounds of it they might have some incentive to make this go away.There is a major scandal waiting. I will enjoy what happens neCKST
I really do enjoy how Boomia creates bits for these interactionsThere isn't a second judgement, stlaker. Those are the court's delusions.
View attachment 160875
Pat had said this to a redditor over text last week too. Mentally ill fat hog
"Anyways Patrick I'll give you this one for free.Found on r/Ashoka
View attachment 160815
Meanwhile:
View attachment 160816
Back to the group chat:
View attachment 160817View attachment 160818
So Cat Rambo sat around and waited for the debt to double and then stroked a personal check for over 30 G’s?I still think it could be former leadership who don't want Pat's finances looked into.
You're assuming Pat would tell her about that, or that she wouldn't believe his nonsense about wriggling out of it. She was stupid enough to dump 100K on this nonsense to begin with. Also she can't have been the only one at SFWA who greenlighted it - everyone involved has skin in the game.So Cat Rambo sat around and waited for the debt to double and then stroked a personal check for over 30 G’s?
Seems far fetched.
She and the others spent SFWA money on it but they aren’t in charge of that money anymore. None of the odd bums can afford to find that now with their personal money. It’s way more likely, if they did something illegal, that one of them would have rolled on the others for immunity by now.You're assuming Pat would tell her about that, or that she wouldn't believe his nonsense about wriggling out of it. She was stupid enough to dump 100K on this nonsense to begin with. Also she can't have been the only one at SFWA who greenlighted it - everyone involved has skin in the game.
So they're not culpable for financial crime if they're not holding the bag any more?She and the others spent SFWA money on it but they aren’t in charge of that money anymore.
You sound pretty certain of that but I don't see any proof.None of the odd bums can afford to find that now with their personal money.
This is just a naive way of viewing human behavior.It’s way more likely, if they did something illegal, that one of them would have rolled on the others for immunity by now.
Also note she cancelled her appearance at the last con Pat was a guest for. She doesn’t want to deal with him at all.You're assuming Pat would tell her about that, or that she wouldn't believe his nonsense about wriggling out of it. She was stupid enough to dump 100K on this nonsense to begin with. Also she can't have been the only one at SFWA who greenlighted it - everyone involved has skin in the game.
If I remember there was some concern that this kind of thing if it got out could screw with their charity tax statusShe and the others spent SFWA money on it but they aren’t in charge of that money anymore. None of the odd bums can afford to find that now with their personal money. It’s way more likely, if they did something illegal, that one of them would have rolled on the others for immunity by now.
I never said they’re not culpable, I said they aren’t in charge any more so they can’t agree to paying off the debt. And we have plenty of proof that they’re all a bunch of broke losers. I think Scalzi might be the only SFWA or adjacent person we’ve seen who didn’t live in some poverty shithole.So they're not culpable for financial crime if they're not holding the bag any more?
You sound pretty certain of that but I don't see any proof.
This is just a naive way of viewing human behavior.
I’m guessing some NDA’s were involved - remember Pat bragged about signing one around the time of the suit? He’s been very careful to tip toe around the vague “group” funding his suit - even to Joshua moon who if I remember right was told by Pat that kind of stuff was off the recordSo they're not culpable for financial crime if they're not holding the bag any more?
You sound pretty certain of that but I don't see any proof.
This is just a naive way of viewing human behavior.
We know every single aspect of his life. He posts it. If it’s not on his Twitter it doesn’t exist.we don't know every aspect of his life. there are lots of people we don't know about who could've given him the money.
fatrick isn't literally a tv show where there was a character introduced earlier that foreshadowed who paid off the debt.
retards.
how many people in your own life do you know that will gift you tens of thousands of dollars? while you remain willingly unemployed and after going on multiple vacations recently?we don't know every aspect of his life. there are lots of people we don't know about who could've given him the money.
fatrick isn't literally a tv show where there was a character introduced earlier that foreshadowed who paid off the debt.
retards.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/