I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! Updated Schedules, Links to Casefiles

[guest]

341 Meeting of Creditors
Approximately a month after filing, the trustee will call a first meeting of creditors, which the debtor must attend. This proceeding is also referred to as the § 341 meeting, named after the corresponding section of the bankruptcy code. Creditors rarely attend a Chapter 7 bankruptcy meeting; one or two creditors may attend a Chapter 13 meeting, especially if there is a question as to the legitimacy of some aspect of the plan. Objections are typically resolved by negotiation between the debtor or the debtor’s counsel and the creditor. If a compromise can not be reached, a judge will intervene.

The meeting of creditors typically lasts about five minutes. You will receive notice of the location of the meeting but you may contact the court to confirm the address and time. (see [URL='http://www.wisconsinbankruptcy.com/court.html']Wisconsin Bankruptcy Court Directory[/URL]) Most Chapter 7 filings involve no non-exempt assets, however, if you filed for Chapter 7 and do have non-exempt assets, you will have to turn over non-exempt property (or its fair market value in cash) to the trustee after the meeting. The trustee will sell this property and distribute the proceeds to your creditors. If the property isn’t worth a great deal or would be hard to sell, the trustee may decide to abandon the property (and return it to you). Trustees and creditors have 60 days to challenge the debtor’s right to a discharge. If there are no challenges, you will receive a notice from the court that your dischargeable debts have been discharged within three to six months.

 

[FurBurger]

Cash advances. When a debtor obtains more than $1,000 (as of April 1, 2019) from one creditor within 70 days of filing for bankruptcy, the debt is presumed fraudulent and nondischargeable.

I wonder when Pat got his last payout from the SFWA legal fund?

Also, that fellow who isn't a lawyer has suggested Pat's fucked up the homestead exception by renting out half of the hovel; so that's back on the block.

 

[guest]

I wonder when Pat got his last payout from the SFWA legal fund?

Also, that fellow who isn't a lawyer has suggested Pat's fucked up the homestead exception by renting out half of the hovel; so that's back on the block.

NAL but I doubt his dealings with the SFWA would count as a cash advance. It would just be an unsecured loan like any other. I presume they're eather paying the lawyers directly or reimbursing him when he pays them. A cash advance would be drawing cash from a line of credit for whatever you want it for.

And yeah, they done goofed by renting out half that house. I'm not sure if Quaso will be able to forclose it or not but I would think at the very least he'll be able to garnish that rent.

 

[guest]

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.rent.com/wisconsin/milwaukee-houses/1912-e-linnwood-ave-4-lv207799493[/URL]

here is a somewhat comperable rental in his neighborhood. This one is a bit closer to the college and probably a bit nicer than Rick's and its $1700/mo.

so if the hovel rents at, say, $1400/mo he would have to turn over about 18 monthly payments (including interest) to Quaso if he doesn't get to keep any himself. I guess that could be negatiated during the proceedings depending on how charitible he feels like being.

The problem will be that Quaso won't be the only creditor. If the SFWA is looking for $150k+ then he may only get a few hundred bucks a month for years.

 

[guest]

Some new document at Sanny Franny case, comment @notalawyer ?

 

[Harry Powell]

reading through the new doc now.

so basically, this was all a fuck up by Brinton, by naming Quasi in the WI action. Brinton had to be smart enough to know that was a fawkin’ problem. So either Pigman demanded Quasi be John Doe 1, or Brinton thought by having Quaso be Doe 1 he would intimidate him into folding.

all in all, poor gamesmanship

 

[guest]

Some new document at Sanny Franny case, comment @notalawyer ?

Nothing interesting, just a formality. The decision was already online. This is showing that order is finalized and has been sent to everyone. Same information.

 

[Harry Powell]

Exhibit A is basically Judge Stein’s summary with Patso’s argument included. Everything before Exhibit A is Schulman kicking ass.

 

[guest]

reading through the new doc now.

so basically, this was all a fuck up by Brinton, by naming Quasi in the WI action. Brinton had to be smart enough to know that was a fawkin’ problem. So either Pigman demanded Quasi be John Doe 1, or Brinton thought by having Quaso be Doe 1 he would intimidate him into folding.

all in all, poor gamesmanship

Maybe they thought that IIED and other claims were enough or something.

 

[guest]

reading through the new doc now.

so basically, this was all a fuck up by Brinton, by naming Quasi in the WI action. Brinton had to be smart enough to know that was a fawkin’ problem. So either Pigman demanded Quasi be John Doe 1, or Brinton thought by having Quaso be Doe 1 he would intimidate him into folding.

all in all, poor gamesmanship

Seems like something quasi probably researched before determining where to file the quash. They even tried to argue this in their first response. The California laws are built for a reason. Wisconsin and other places don't have anti-slapp are used for slapp shit.

As we've seen If you have the money you can just file the complaint in some bullshit venue. For example, the Honorable judge Ashley who after legitimate concerns of no named defendant for three months seemed perfectly ok with extending it a year.

You can just file bullshit subpoenas for nonsense suits and get the person to fold under attorney fees. It was a way around the slapp laws which is why the attorney fee sanction is specific to out of state subpoenas.

It Patrick wasn't lying in the Josiah tapes , then it is possible Brinton actually had no idea this was even possible...given the fact that he submitted stolen evidence this is probable.

 

[guest]

 

[guest]

It Patrick wasn't lying

 

[Mitch Weaver]

So what are the odds the cuck walks away or attempts to refile against the other 59 does?

 

[guest]

Approximately a month after filing, the trustee will call a first meeting of creditors, which the debtor must attend

Does this meeting take place over zoom? I think my buddy Nigel Igger would be interested in attending

 

[Harry Powell]

All this assumes bankruptcy. What’s the proper protocol if he doesn’t have to do that? Can Quaso demand it all at once or does he have to allow a payment plan

 

[guest]

All this assumes bankruptcy. What’s the proper protocol if he doesn’t have to do that? Can Quaso demand it all at once or does he have to allow a payment plan

California - [URL]https://www.courts.ca.gov/partners/documents/collecting.pdf[/URL]

Wisconsin - [URL]https://www.wisbar.org/newspublications/wisconsinlawyer/pages/Article.aspx?Volume=89&Issue=7&ArticleID=24973[/URL]

 

[guest]

Reminder: $23,739.25 isn't a number that the judge pulled out of thin air to punish Pig for being a stupid fuck. That's how much money Quasi had to come up with to defend himself legally. The vast majority of us don't have that kind of money lying around. Patrick is a valid piece of human garbage who used $100,000 of other people's money to "scare" us for a few months with this lawsuit that was DOA. He is a leech on society who has also milked the government (our paychecks) for hundreds of thousands of dollars. He is a valid piece of human garbage and it's time for him to take responsibility for his actions and face the consequences. Anyways it's nice that we have these things.

 

[guest]

Reminder: $23,739.25 isn't a number that the judge pulled out of thin air to punish Pig for being a stupid fuck. That's how much money Quasi had to come up with to defend himself legally. The vast majority of us don't have that kind of money lying around.

Exactly. That's his own money out of his own pocket that he is owed back. A concept completely foreign to Pat.

Pat had to think up magical ways for how someone would arrange the financing to fight him in court. Obviously the plan was to use the court case to bully people into submission financially. Then he turns around and cries to Josiah about how court is all about who has the most money when he's the one who has spent six figures.

 

[Harry Powell]

California - https://www.courts.ca.gov/partners/documents/collecting.pdf

Wisconsin - https://www.wisbar.org/newspublicat...rticle.aspx?Volume=89&Issue=7&ArticleID=24973

That was some fantastic morning reading. I’m sure Quaso will never be able to give us the details, but knowing that these gears are in motion is a beautiful thing.

 

[guest]

That was some fantastic morning reading. I’m sure Quaso will never be able to give us the details, but knowing that these gears are in motion is a beautiful thing.

I don’t see why he wouldn’t be able to tell us. It all should be public when it gets filed anyways