• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! Updated Schedules, Links to Casefiles

IGotATreeOnMyHouse85

Stand Alone Fruit
Forum Clout
245,846
The article that proves Brinton Resto used illegally-obtained forum content for his case?
I feel this could be a good thing due to recent developments of Piggy admitting some troubling things. Also explains why Resto was ok with telling Judge Ashley that odds are this whole thing is getting tossed. Resto wants this shit to end just as much as we do, he knows word was starting to get out. Also explains why we haven’t seen video 4 and 5.
 

Clint Ruin

I'm sorry, who are you?
Forum Clout
51,154
Watch them submit the medium articles as new evidence despite having nothing to do with the Quasi

They wouldn't have tried to get them removed if that were the case. They let obituary comments sit there for a year, they didn't come off that page until some time afte the lolsuit had been filed. If those interviews would have helped their case, they wouldn't have been DCMA'd so quickly.
 
G

guest

Guest
Without a sworn testimony from the mole it doesn't prove anything, legally speaking.

Well BrinTon submitted a screenshot where he was logged in. Presumably quasi can confirm if that section of the forums was private. You'll notice all the other screenshots entered as evidence were done using the court software. This one was not. You can't just enter evidence, swear its valid and then say... uhh yeah I don't know how I was able to log in, I don't remember the username.

*you've played yourself.gif*
 
G

guest

Guest
Well BrinTon submitted a screenshot where he was logged in. Presumably quasi can confirm if that section of the forums was private. You'll notice all the other screenshots entered as evidence were done using the court software. This one was not. You can't just enter evidence, swear its valid and then say... uhh yeah I don't know how I was able to log in, I don't remember the username.

*you've played yourself.gif*
khaled-dj-khaled.gif
 

peckafacce

Farted in Nikis pussy
Forum Clout
15,809
Well BrinTon submitted a screenshot where he was logged in. Presumably quasi can confirm if that section of the forums was private. You'll notice all the other screenshots entered as evidence were done using the court software. This one was not. You can't just enter evidence, swear its valid and then say... uhh yeah I don't know how I was able to log in, I don't remember the username.

*you've played yourself.gif*
If Brinton was stupid enough to submit evidence while using a hacked log in I am not sure if my erection will ever go away.
 
G

guest

Guest
Are they really DMCA’ing all of these things?

Maybe I’m misunderstanding how this all works but isn’t it a crime to falsely DMCA something but the only reason the Joe and Rick have been able to do it is because the owner would have to reveal themselves to challenge it, right? But if they’re also attempting to doxx the owner of this content then what happens if they’re successful? They get hit with a bunch of false DMCA charges, right?
 

Clint Ruin

I'm sorry, who are you?
Forum Clout
51,154
Are they really DMCA’ing all of these things?

Maybe I’m misunderstanding how this all works but isn’t it a crime to falsely DMCA something but the only reason the Joe and Rick have been able to do it is because the owner would have to reveal themselves to challenge it, right? But if they’re also attempting to doxx the owner of this content then what happens if they’re successful? They get hit with a bunch of false DMCA charges, right?

I think Mr. Munoz neither wants to be doxxed, nor thinks the effort of disputing it has more upside than just reuploading elsewhere.
 

Slackjawed Cow

I laugh at them because they're all the same.
Forum Clout
272,522
Are they really DMCA’ing all of these things?

Maybe I’m misunderstanding how this all works but isn’t it a crime to falsely DMCA something but the only reason the Joe and Rick have been able to do it is because the owner would have to reveal themselves to challenge it, right? But if they’re also attempting to doxx the owner of this content then what happens if they’re successful? They get hit with a bunch of false DMCA charges, right?
All of that sounds about right to me.
 

IGotATreeOnMyHouse85

Stand Alone Fruit
Forum Clout
245,846
He did indeed to exactly that, which is why it is now in their best interest for this lolsuit to go away
That’s what I’m thinking, Pats legal team is well aware that others know of all the stupid shit they’ve done and now want the whole thing to go away. What lawyer tells a judge that their case will most likely be thrown out in less than a week meaning it’s been a giant waste of time? One that wants it to go away before the details come out.
 
G

guest

Guest
I think Mr. Munoz neither wants to be doxxed, nor thinks the effort of disputing it has more upside than just reuploading elsewhere.
Right but my point is that Rick is actively trying to name him in the suit, so if he were to be successful in that then there would be no reason not to hit him with all the false DMCA stuff. His stupidity is forging his chains.
 
Top