Grown men that enjoy the movie "Hook"

[Dawn’sHairyClit]

Mama Raven indulged this chubby child to no end.

 

[AntsBatteryCharge]

Even as a kid, I couldn't stand that gay part at the end where Williams says "thank you for believing." Yuck

 

[Dawn’sHairyClit]

Mama Raven ruined that child.

 

[fricklefrackle]

All I remember from Hook is that it sucked and reading in Thrasher magazine the pro skaters who worked as stunt doubles in it saying that Robin Williams REEKED of B.O.

 

[guest]

The story of Hook is that Peter Pan grows up, forgets that he is Peter Pan, and becomes a self-absorbed workaholic that neglects his family.
In a confusing turn of events, he has to regain his peter pan nature to save his child. *huh*

Rick believes he still is Peter Pan; and he really is a self-absorbed child that completely absolves himself of all adult responsibilities.
I believe he likes Hook because he thinks, "I am already Peter Pan, child, and I have no family to save"

He just wants to be a kid so he can look up girls skirts and not be branded a pedophile.

 

[guest]

Jews and the origin of the name "Pan"

Besides the obvious Peter Pan "never grow up" stuff, chomos are obsessed with the Pan figure from Greek mythology for some reason. I can't remember if this was posted here, but there was a twitter thread earlier this year about all the pedo activity in the "sci-fi community" and in particular with prominent figures within the SFWA. One of them was Walter Breen, the husband of famous fantasy author Marion Zimmer Bradley. He wrote for a publication called "Pan." Just look at this fucking creep.

Thread:
[URL unfurl="true"]https://twitter.com/conan_esq/status/1532952393201070080[/URL]

Here's some excerpts from an article about him and his wife's abuse of children (Pan references in bold):

The general public became aware of MZB’s sexual abuse history after the publication of her daughter’s revelations in 2014, but SF fandom should have been aware of them for much, much longer, because MZB’s husband Walter Breen was a known sexual abuser in the 1960s, and she was known to be facilitating his activities. The early history of Breen’s abuse is laid out in an awful document called [URL='https://breendoggle.fandom.com/wiki/Breendoggle_Wiki']The Breendoggle[/URL] that can now be read online. This document outlines Walter Breen’s history of sexual abuse of children in the “fandom” circles of 1960s Berkeley, and the efforts to get him expelled from a convention. It’s absolutely shocking to read about how publicly and flagrantly he sexually assaulted children, and how sanguine the people around him were about it. At the end of the document we find out why: If they exclude Walter from fandom for openly abusing children, MZB will stay away too.This is the first hint of MZB’s deep commitment to sexual abuse of children, but it isn’t just a hint. Her husband Walter Breen wrote a book about abusing children, called Greek Love, and also edited a journal devoted to pederasty called the International Journal of Greek Love. MZB [URL='http://exitinterview.biz/rarities/ijgl/htmfiles/ijg1p48.htm']wrote an article for this journal[/URL] about pederasty among lesbians, so she was obviously aware of her husband’s political activities and supportive enough of them to write articles for his journal of child abuse. This journal and Breen’s book, by the way, were cited by the editors of the magazine Pan, which was connected to the North American Man Boy Love Association (a paedophile advocacy group in America) and the Paedophile Information Exchange (a similar and at one stage radically activist group in the UK). It’s hard to find Pan online but the [URL='http://exitinterview.biz/hisurvey/index.htm']index[/URL] of the site holding MZB’s article includes links to some of its articles. Following links through the articles linked above will also lead to more information about MZB’s open support of child sexual abuse, such as helping Breen to adopt a boy he wanted to abuse, sexually abusing a friend’s daughter, and supporting Breen even after they divorced despite his repeated legal troubles over his paedophilia.

I hope from this that it’s clear that MZB was an ideologically committed child sexual abuser, who was definitely supporting at least one other committed sexual abuser and may have been part of an international network of sexual abusers that was active in the 1970s in the USA, Canada and the UK. So let’s see what the introduction of her first novel in the Mists of Avalon series is like. But before we do, let’s briefly look at the political paedophilia movement in the 1970s.​

The politics of paedophilia in the 1970s

I can’t believe I had to write that line, but there it is. Believe it or not, in the 1970s and 1980s there was a movement to normalize sexual assault of children, which had its own political organizations, journals, magazines, meetings and rhetoric. Sadly the most famous part of it was connected to the gay rights movement, and the attempts by these people to insert themselves into the gay rights movement and turn it into a kind of pan-sexual liberation movement were seized upon by conservatives as ammunition against gay rights generally. The most famous organization is the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), which is well-described in the documentary Chickenhawk, but there was also a British organization and some groups on the continent.​

These groups operated on a couple of basic principles, which are worth bearing in mind as we interrogate MZB’s work. They believed that children had sexual agency, that childhood is not a period of innocence, and that children actively solicited and enjoyed sex with adults. Breen in his journal of Greek Love, and other advocates in the magazine Pan argue that these sexual relationships help children grow and mature, and the exchange of sexual affection from the child for adult wisdom from the man is important for child development – they don’t just believe paedophilia is harmless, but actively beneficial to children. They also believe that these paedophiliac relationships were a normal part of most of human society and have only recently been cast into disrepute, usually due to Victorian prudishness, christian interference, or some form of communist or fascist political program (it seems it can be either). Some people writing in the journal Pan seem to hint that adult homosexuality is wrong but same sex relationships between a man and a boy are okay. They also adhere to strong principles of free speech, both for their political advocacy and for their kiddy porn, which they don’t believe harms anyone. Some of them seem to think assaulting infants is wrong but children above a certain age are fair game (or, as my father used to say with a straight face, “old enough to bleed, old enough to breed”). Most of the advocacy seems to have been focused around same sex male relationships, but there was no particular political preference in this regard – I think they just had a clearer voice because briefly in the 1980s and 1990s they were allowed some affiliation with the gay rights movement, to its detriment.​

Source:
[URL unfurl="true"]https://faustusnotes.com/2021/08/13/re-reading-the-mists-of-avalon-in-light-of-marion-zimmer-bradleys-fall-from-grace/[/URL]

Sick shit. We joke sometimes but seriously, what the fuck is up with this?

A side note about Spielberg, he is of course a well-known donor to the Democratic party so obviously a liberal. One thing that stood out on his wikipedia:

Spielberg resigned as a member of the national advisory board of the [URL='https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy_Scouts_of_America']Boy Scouts of America[/URL] in 2001 because he disagreed with the organization's [URL='https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy_Scouts_of_America_membership_controversies#Position_on_homosexuality']anti-homosexuality stance[/URL].

Perhaps not a surprising stance from him, but it is worth noting that the Boy Scouts are basically being sued into bankruptcy for all the homosexual abuse cases they've lost. LOTTA strange activity surrounding the Peter Pan fans.

 

[Dog Eater]

I tried reading the unabridged Peter Pan once, I’m pretty sure there was descriptions of Wendy’s blossoming breasts or some such pedo shit. I’m not saying that PATRICK S. TOMLINSON IS A PEDOPHILE WHO LOVES THE WORKS OF OTHER PEDOPHILES AND IS FRIENDS WITH MULTIPLE PEDOPHILES, RAPISTS AND CONVICTED SEX OFFENDERS but it sure is strange that PATRICK S. TOMLINSON ADORES MOVIES MADE BY PEDOPHILES BASED ON BOOKS WRITTEN BY PEDOPHILES AND PAYS FOR MEMBERSHIP IN AN ORGANISATION RUN BY PEDOPHILES. It really makes you think.

 

[guest]

Even Spielberg expressed disappointment with it. It's just objectively not a good film. It's too long and disjointed. Granted it has some great production design and Dustin Hoffman is pretty good as a depressed, attention-seeking Hook, but that's about it. How it could make any grown man's Top 5 movie list is bewildering.

I've said it on here before but I put it on for my older son last Christmas. About 10 minutes after they get to Neverland he said it was boring and wanted to shut it off and play cards with me. This an 8 year old with better taste in movies than Fat Pat.