We’re getting back to Trump mooing

[Torque’sHeadBump]

 

[guest]

"They call him Lazy Joey Cumia. That's what they call him, folks. Not my name, that's just what a lotta people call him. 65 years old and has never had a job, can you believe that? Most people are looking forward to retiring at his age, not Lazy Joe. Never had a real job. Calls himself a musician. What a joke. He plays covers of other people's music, and horribly I might add. But that's not where most of his money comes from. Do you know what he does? He lives off his little brother, who's a slob as well by the way. Very creepy guy, I've met him a coupla times. He had a radio show that was doing horribly in the ratings until I did them a favor and made a few appearances on it. So Joe lives off his brother, Creepy Tony. What a bum. Is that how we're going to make America great again? With people like that? Zero work ethic? Entitled? Horrible attitude? We don't need them. It's time to send them back to where they came from. One of those shithole countries where they hate America. Good riddance."

 

[Sue Lightning]

Ok, as someone who read about this situation and is mildly invested in US politics beyond Fox headlines. These lawsuits were never going to have a chance anyway. These arguments have been made before the Supreme Court and shut down: That certain people accused of treason or who broke their oath cannot run for office. The reasoning for this is the language of the 14th:

“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”

The key here is that Trump was President and thus isn’t described in the passage. So you would have to include the President under the terms of “hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State”. and “who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,”. The courts have previously argued Presidents are exempt from this as it does not apply to elected officials, only ones appointed or voted in by elected officials themselves such as Supreme Court Justices. It should also be noted that this is a very state oriented movement, not one coming down from the national DNC.

 

[Torque’sHeadBump]

Ok, as someone who read about this situation and is mildly invested in US politics beyond Fox headlines. These lawsuits were never going to have a chance anyway. These arguments have been made before the Supreme Court and shut down: That certain people accused of treason or who broke their oath cannot run for office. The reasoning for this is the language of the 14th:

“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”

The key here is that Trump was President and thus isn’t described in the passage. So you would have to include the President under the terms of “hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State”. and “who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,”. The courts have previously argued Presidents are exempt from this as it does not apply to elected officials, only ones appointed or voted in by elected officials themselves such as Supreme Court Justices. It should also be noted that this is a very state oriented movement, not one coming down from the national DNC.

In true Joseph Cumia fashion, you kept it brief. Thank you, sir.

 

[BonnieMcFarlaneMe2]

Ok, as someone who read about this situation and is mildly invested in US politics beyond Fox headlines. These lawsuits were never going to have a chance anyway. These arguments have been made before the Supreme Court and shut down: That certain people accused of treason or who broke their oath cannot run for office. The reasoning for this is the language of the 14th:

“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”

The key here is that Trump was President and thus isn’t described in the passage. So you would have to include the President under the terms of “hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State”. and “who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,”. The courts have previously argued Presidents are exempt from this as it does not apply to elected officials, only ones appointed or voted in by elected officials themselves such as Supreme Court Justices. It should also be noted that this is a very state oriented movement, not one coming down from the national DNC.

I prefer to not know anything.

 

[Sue Lightning]

In true Joseph Cumia fashion, you kept it brief. Thank you, sir.

Ironically this is stuff that cant really be explained briefly, and in Joes post he’s actually keeping it brief.

 

[Torque’sHeadBump]

Ironically this is stuff that cant really be explained briefly, and in Joes post he’s actually keeping it brief.

He can’t lecture like he used to, otherwise people might think “Layla River” (a 15 year old girl) is actually Joseph Cumia (a 64 year old man).

 

[Consensual Rapist]

Ol’ Joe is afraid the LIBTARDS will take what remains of nana’s vast fortune of a thousand dollars. In that bovine mind, that money is rightfully his, tax free.

 

[wbgreen]

ehh, Trump was never going to win CO anyway, state is too liberal now. Used to be a state for cowboys, now it's a state for Joe Cumia cowboys, if you get my meaning.