• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Was Patrick's return to Reddit 7 days ago ever posted?

Brooke Shields

Patrick Tomlinson hates me because I am a woman
Forum Clout
68,189
I remember the gay post but don't remember if his actual comments were brought up

This "murdered" by words subreddit post, don't read it, it's fake and gay
1658802838783.png



The big pig was very proud of his "Gedankenexperiment" getting so much recognition! (he then got 1 upvote)
1658802931826.png

Not sure how abortion is about misogyny considering 50% of women are against it, but i have a human's brain.


Let's see what attention his unnoticed humble-brag garnered.
For some reason it shows as deleted..?
1658803092978.png

Oof, the only person on his side is not a fan of humanity and forgot his pig name.
Let me highlight that one comment real quick
1658803279116.png

^makes absolutely no sense. His pig brain meant to say sex doesn't matter, a nazi is a nazi(political) but he ended up saying something about nazis aren't political...


Let's continue that thread
1658803179132.png

Yikes.
That one stung considering Fatso didn't even respond to incorrectly correct the record.




Have a wonderful morning shit. SEE ya
 
G

guest

Guest
I really wish this got more traction. Patrick's "thought experiment" was plagiarized from a paper that was written 15 years ago. The true author, Gregor Damschen, deserves to be credited anywhere Patrick brags about "legalizing abortion in Argentina" or whatever the fuck

[URL unfurl="true"]https://philpapers.org/rec/DAMSSE[/URL]
 

Meownaw

I GOT DA HAT NOW!
Forum Clout
208,686
I really wish this got more traction. Patrick's "thought experiment" was plagiarized from a paper that was written 15 years ago. The true author, Gregor Damschen, deserves to be credited anywhere Patrick brags about "legalizing abortion in Argentina" or whatever the fuck

Even though I don't agree with his dumb trolly argument it's written well and doesn't make me physically angry reading like the plagiarized pig man version.
 

bovinebrain

MIND CONTROL!!!
Forum Clout
13,481
I really don’t get the question. The premise is stupid because the moment you take the embryos away from their storage they will die. So it only makes sense to save the baby. And that’s coming from me who’s pretty much 100% pro-choice unless you’re using it for birth control, at which point I think you’re a sick asshole but I don’t really care enough for that baby anyways because it’s probably gonna be as stupid as the parents who want to murder it.
 

FranksWirecutters

Glow nigger. Got any of those IPs for me?
Forum Clout
31,577
I really don’t get the question. The premise is stupid because the moment you take the embryos away from their storage they will die. So it only makes sense to save the baby. And that’s coming from me who’s pretty much 100% pro-choice unless you’re using it for birth control, at which point I think you’re a sick asshole but I don’t really care enough for that baby anyways because it’s probably gonna be as stupid as the parents who want to murder it.
Wrong choice, nazi child.
 

DeadWithoutMyDavid

xe/xim/xey
Forum Clout
40,121
I really don’t get the question. The premise is stupid because the moment you take the embryos away from their storage they will die. So it only makes sense to save the baby. And that’s coming from me who’s pretty much 100% pro-choice unless you’re using it for birth control, at which point I think you’re a sick asshole but I don’t really care enough for that baby anyways because it’s probably gonna be as stupid as the parents who want to murder it.
You could also eat all the embryos so your body will incubate them to maturity AND STILL save the kid
 

ActionJackson

What did you think we'd be doing today?
Forum Clout
1,778
I really don’t get the question. The premise is stupid because the moment you take the embryos away from their storage they will die. So it only makes sense to save the baby. And that’s coming from me who’s pretty much 100% pro-choice unless you’re using it for birth control, at which point I think you’re a sick asshole but I don’t really care enough for that baby anyways because it’s probably gonna be as stupid as the parents who want to murder it.
It's a really fawkin' stupid premise with some bigly flawed reasoning. If you follow the logic behind Porkrick's stolen thought experiment, what it is really saying is that by NOT aborting babies you will cause living children to die. It is essentially making the argument that for every 1000 abortions performed, the life of a five year old child will be saved. In his pig brain, you must abort embryos to save already living children. A real 1.7 take, botherman.
 

Clint Ruin

I'm sorry, who are you?
Forum Clout
51,126
I really wish this got more traction. Patrick's "thought experiment" was plagiarized from a paper that was written 15 years ago. The true author, Gregor Damschen, deserves to be credited anywhere Patrick brags about "legalizing abortion in Argentina" or whatever the fuck

What makes Pig's interpretation even more disgusting is that the original thought experiment ends with the conclusion that there is no right answer, both are ethically horrible. Pig takes the exact same premise and declares there to be one correct answer.
 
Top