• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

The SFWA ghosted Patrick

SensibleKeks

Forum Clout
20,059

Allow us to introduce ourselves. We are Patrick T**** and Niki R****.​


Customer: Hello. Allow us to introduce ourselves. We are Patrick T**** and Niki R****. We are seeking legal representation for an upcoming Contempt of Court hearing. Our case is unique and complex. For the last five years, we have been the all-consuming obsession of a group of anonymous online cyberstalkers. Their publicly stated goal is to destroy our reputations and careers, break up our marriage, and ultimately to drive Patrick to commit suicide. We have been impersonated hundreds of times online, had our Social Security numbers stolen, dozens of fraudulent credit card and loan applications made out in our names, our home trespassed and property vandalized, physically stalked across multiple states, received dozens of rape and death threats via email and voicemail, texted threats and harassment dozens of times per day, massive fake review bombing of Patrick's novels and Niki's business, our home has been SWATTed by the MPD forty-three times and counting, and six bomb threats against public venues across three states made in our names, including the bomb threat last Dec 10th right here in Milwaukee against the Riverside Theater and Patti LaBelle.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...usg=AOvVaw1Rpn0WeQKZhBpE0W-4fwkZ&opi=89978449

Our ordeal has made national news on multiple networks and platforms:
-Internet Trolls Have Tormented Patrick Tomlinson for Years and He Can’t Stop Them (thedailybeast.com) https://www.thedailybeast.com/inter...ick-tomlinson-for-years-and-he-cant-stop-them

-Supreme Court ruling on online harassment angers victims, advocates - The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/tech...reme-court-harassment-ruling-first-amendment/

-The FBI has formed a national database to track and prevent 'swatting' (nbcnews.com) https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fbi-formed-national-database-track-prevent-swatting-rcna91722

-Author Says He's Being Swatted by Cyber Stalkers for Tweet | Inside Edition https://www.insideedition.com/media...his-wife-say-they-were-swatted-42-times-82359

The criminal stalking cult hunting us has a dedicated website, new.onaforums.net, created expressly for the purpose of planning, coordinating, executing, and bragging about their campaign of obsessive harassment and terrorism against our entire family. With law enforcement ranging from utterly useless to actively harmful to our cause, in 2020 we brought a lawsuit against the owner/administrator of the website and dozens of his users for defamation, tortious interference, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and other civil charges. The intention was to unmask the website owner so he could be deposed for identifying information on the users committing the most serious crimes against us so they could be turned over to the police for criminal charges. This lawsuit was funded by a professional organization Patrick is a member of. Cloudflare and Google were subpoenaed for the identity of the site owner. Then, after nearly two years, a California judge ruled that not only was the anonymity of the criminals stalking and terrorizing us more important than our physical safety and quashed the subpoena for the site owner's identity, but went further still and ruled that we owe his legal fees, totaling over $50,000 at this point (San Francisco Superior Court Case # *****). The professional organization funding the lawsuit agreed to pay the settlement and an NDA agreement was signed, but later ghosted us entirely and we have not heard from them or their counsel in over a year. We were never informed by our lawyer of the possibility to appeal the ruling, which we would have done had we known. The debt has since been domesticated in Wisconsin

JA: Has he talked to a lawyer about this?
Customer: We've had multiple lawyers involved - if you read the above, we need a lawyer for the contempt hearing
JA: What steps have been taken so far?
Customer: That's all in what I wrote above
JA: Is there anything else the Lawyer should know before I connect you? Rest assured that they'll be able to help you.
Customer: No, just need them to read the above message

Q&A time:
Simmons Esq., Expert
Hello! I'm Attorney Simmons, with over 14 years of experience practicing law in multiple states. I kindly request a moment to review your question and conduct legal research to provide an accurate answer. Please note that JustAnswer is a website that offers general information and does not establish an attorney-client relationship or provide legal representation. If you are seeking to retain an attorney, I recommend visiting www.avvo.com, where you can find local representation and often receive a free consultation. For criminal defense cases, a public defender may be appointed during your first court appearance if you are unable to afford an attorney.If I provide you with unfavorable news regarding the law, please understand that I am merely conveying the existing laws, as I did not create them. I apologize if the law does not align with your desired outcome. I understand that facing legal troubles can be challenging, but I am here to assist you to the best of my ability.--------------------

Simmons Esq., Expert
We just answer general legal questions here.

Simmons Esq., Expert
To hire an attorney, you need to go to avvo.com.

Simmons Esq., Expert
Do you know who these people are?

Customer
OK so I guess my question is what type of lawyer do you think we should hire for this?

Customer
No, we do not know who they are. That's been the problem.

Simmons Esq., Expert
Then until you know who they are, there's no point to hire an attorney.

Simmons Esq., Expert
You need to hire a digital investigator to try to figure out who they are.

Simmons Esq., Expert
I'm here to assist you further if you have any additional questions or concerns. To ensure your question is directed to me, please start a new chat window and include the phrase "For Simmons Esq Only.." at the beginning of your question.Adding me to your favorites at the bottom of the page will make it easier to reach me directly in the future. Alternatively, you can mention "@Simmons Esq" in the new question chat to get my attention.Your ratings are greatly appreciated. Thank you!_____________________________

I wonder who this mystery Patrick T*** is?! Truly a Post by Ghost :pfg_sm:




 

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
115,162
If you look at the lawyer's response, this was asked/responded to 7 months ago. The contempt court case is over (satisfied you could say). This is another case of fatso oversharing to complete strangers, again.
I’m not trying to be the contrarian douche its that, just like Pat swatting himself, its too good to be true, even though its SO dumb it has to be.
 

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
115,162
My first thought was that this was too good to be true, it's a brotherman doing a bit. I just don't see Pat pleading for help to the public like this, I could see Niki doing it though.
The perspective is obviously from Nikki in the writing but that also is less funster-ish. If a retard were to try to ask legal advice like this they’d pretend to be Patrick, not Nikki.
 

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
77,896
My first thought was that this was too good to be true, it's a brotherman doing a bit. I just don't see Pat pleading for help to the public like this, I could see Niki doing it though.
If the date of this is before his pro se motion it seems pretty weird a funster would know that he was looking for a lawyer but couldn't get one. No one really was predicting that. Otherwise, it's written in a really strange way. But not Wisconsin retard strange.
 

JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler

I Am Racist Man Leader of the Digital Ku Klux Klan
Forum Clout
47,459
JA: Has he talked to a lawyer about this?
Customer: We've had multiple lawyers involved - if you read the above, we need a lawyer for the contempt hearing
JA: What steps have been taken so far?
Customer: That's all in what I wrote above
JA: Is there anything else the Lawyer should know before I connect you? Rest assured that they'll be able to help you.
Customer: No, just need them to read the above message
'
This Does sound like something patrick would do. Hes too ImportanT to repeat himself
 

DanMullen'sRetardedNephew

Opie Simp
Forum Clout
89,397
I skipped over this the first time I read it:

fat faggot.png


There's the patented Tomlinson cuntiness that was missing from the first part of the message. He might have had something to do with this, but I still think that if this isn't a bit then it was likely Niki who submitted it.
 

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
77,896
Then, after nearly two years, a California judge ruled that not only was the anonymity of the criminals stalking and terrorizing us more important than our physical safety and quashed the subpoena for the site owner's identity, but went further still and ruled that we owe his legal fees,

That's wrong, doesn't mean anything either way, but its pretty far off. it was like 6 months after the lawsuit not two years.
 

Prison Enjoyer

Status: Enjoying Prison! 😁
Forum Clout
35,754
That's wrong, doesn't mean anything either way, but its pretty far off. it was like 6 months after the lawsuit not two years.

Perhaps he hid it from Niki and said the debt was all "cyberstalker lies" and pretended there was a new ruling that came down once shit got real and Niki was served out of the blue for his Debtor's Exam.

This all definitely sounds like Niki to a T.
 

Slackjawed Cow

I laugh at them because they're all the same.
Forum Clout
262,194

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
77,896
I skipped over this the first time I read it:

View attachment 186677

There's the patented Tomlinson cuntiness that was missing from the first part of the message. He might have had something to do with this, but I still think that if this isn't a bit then it was likely Niki who submitted it.

LMAO thats the stupid website bot template questions. He (if its real) was being a cunt to a bot.

23e23eded.png
 
Top