• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Sweden removes benefits for asylum seekers and they suddenly start leaving. Proof they’re just opportunists looking for handouts.

Forum Clout
2,667
what I describe is actually, in fact, the truth, as accredited news organizations (that can be sued for lying) are all reporting the same thing. I think you need to take a class on evaluating media sources.
I'm glad you've taken a class on how to evaluate news sources. Perhaps you can help: What is an "accredited news organization?" What body does the accrediting? I've never heard of this. And once accredited they can then be sued for lying? If an "accredited news sources," say, makes up a story (lies) about space aliens landing, who has standing to sue? How are damages determined?

Obviously anyone can sue anyone over defamation, but I had no idea "credible news organizations" could be sued for lying.

Learn something new every day...
 
Forum Clout
5,675
Who are you?
I’ve had 3 people use this line of questioning on me over the years:

Dan, boq, and @The Sue Deal

One is an autistic retard who pretended to be gay for attention. One is a schizophrenic Muslim. And the other-worst of all- is Dan

You’re too good for this mullenesque line of attack, mustard. Your Dillahuntyposting will become a major forum thing soon I think. Your redemption story is one for the fawkin ages
 

NoBacon

An honourable man.
Forum Clout
121,206
IMG_7815.jpeg
 
Forum Clout
3,096
Border Patrol representatives said this btw, is also discussed as an issue before by the Dept of homeland security in September of last year
You weren't smart enough to quote me but I'll answer anyways: They don't have a "Department of Homeland Security" in Sweden. Right out of the gate it's bullshit.
All I said was independent YouTuber
AKA someone who REALLY needs the money from views. Have you never heard of clickbait?
"Well if one instance was fake then all instances are fake"

Some really deep thinkers around here. I could deboonk anything you believe using this standard.
"Just because no one has brought back cheese from the moon does NOT mean it isn't made of cheese."
You're a gullible fool. Go buy tRump playing cards.
 
Forum Clout
5,675
You weren't smart enough to quote me but I'll answer anyways: They don't have a "Department of Homeland Security" in Sweden. Right out of the gate it's bullshit.

AKA someone who REALLY needs the money from views. Have you never heard of clickbait?

"Just because no one has brought back cheese from the moon does NOT mean it isn't made of cheese."
You're a gullible fool. Go buy tRump playing cards.
What % of them are legitimate refugees who successfully applied for asylum in Sweden from the first safe country they were in as?

Sweden’s neighbors are all first world, functioning countries. It’s geographically impossible for them to have legitimate “asylum seekers”.
 
Forum Clout
3,096
I'm glad you've taken a class on how to evaluate news sources. Perhaps you can help: What is an "accredited news organization?" What body does the accrediting? I've never heard of this. And once accredited they can then be sued for lying? If an "accredited news sources," say, makes up a story (lies) about space aliens landing, who has standing to sue? How are damages determined?

Obviously anyone can sue anyone over defamation, but I had no idea "credible news organizations" could be sued for lying.

Learn something new every day...
I'm glad you asked.
Broadcast news like ABC and NBC have to publish true information by law. Non broadcast news has no such restrictions, so while my favorite is MSNBC, I always make sure to double check if something seems over the top.
 
Forum Clout
3,096
What % of them are legitimate refugees who successfully applied for asylum in Sweden from the first safe country they were in as?

Sweden’s neighbors are all first world, functioning countries. It’s geographically impossible for them to have legitimate “asylum seekers”.
Do you want to stuff them all in one country and overtax their refugee programs so they can no longer provide for those in need? With the sheer number of Syrians displaced by Bashar's regime and then other nationalities from subsequent conflicts, spreading them out was a necessity. You are neither as smart nor witty as you think you are.
 
Forum Clout
5,675
Do you want to stuff them all in one country and overtax their refugee programs so they can no longer provide for those in need? With the sheer number of Syrians displaced by Bashar's regime and then other nationalities from subsequent conflicts, spreading them out was a necessity. You are neither as smart nor witty as you think you are.
That’s not what I said I said they’re illegitimate refugees per international law.

Also, yes I feel that they should be stuffed In to those countries far away from civilization.
 
Forum Clout
2,667
I
I'm glad you asked.
Broadcast news like ABC and NBC have to publish true information by law. Non broadcast news has no such restrictions, so while my favorite is MSNBC, I always make sure to double check if something seems over the top.
I'm very disappointed. So there is no such thing as "accredited news," it's simply the fact that over-the-air broadcasts are regulated by the FCC, and there are no possible lawsuits for lying, but rather a complaint can be made to the FCC.

Why do you call over-the-air broadcasts "accredited news" when there is no such thing?

Why did you say the "accredited news" sources can be sued for lying when that's not true?

Why did you say, "glad you asked" and answer none of my questions?

Where you misinformed by your media class or are you trying to misinform the forum?

I feel duped.
 

JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS

DMANIAC
Forum Clout
51,977
There are no independent Youtubers. Except maybe the ones with less than 1000 views. The GOP even said their strategy this time was to hire more influencers.
I definitely noticed this with my YouTube grifters. They all literally cover the same topics, same stories, same segments. The DNC has been doing it for decades. Finally the retarded republicans were able to pull off what the other side had mastered 15 years ago.

I think the only difference this time around was that the mainstream media spent all their time attacking Trump as YouTubers talked about Biden walking into walls and slipping on banana peels.

Nobody cares enough to watch Rachel Maddow whine about Trump for the 9th year in a row. WE HEARD YOU
 
Last edited:
Forum Clout
487
I definitely noticed this with my YouTube grifters. They all literally cover the same topics, same stories, same segments. The DNC has been doing it for decades. Finally the retarded republicans were able to pull off what the other side had mastered 15 years ago.

I think the only difference this time around was that the mainstream media spent all their time attacking Trump as YouTubers talked about Biden walked into walls and slipped on banana peels.

Nobody cares enough to watch Rachel Maddow whine about Trump for the 9th year in a row. WE HEARD YOU
I think a big part of it is that a lot of the left-wing Youtubers were against the Israelis and the DNC couldn’t have that
 
Top