• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Satisfying dissection of shitty scam artists The Beatles

Not bad

Not bad

‎
‎
Forum Clout
19,954
G

guest

Guest
That Patreeky guy has the most cookie cutter tastes in music for being a music afficinado. "The Kinks"? of course...

The Beatles were a Tavistock psyop.

[MEDIA=youtube]G3AV-kPhZ2I[/MEDIA]
 
G

guest

Guest
Patreeky said:
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Click to expand...
"I love the Kinks, weeeee"

tye3sd6w7it51.jpg
 
Not bad

Not bad

‎
‎
Forum Clout
19,954
FeedNanaOgura said:
Scaruffi's Beatles article is a popular meme/pasta.
Click to expand...

I know it's circulating a lot, but for good reason. There's lots of good points about how they were just a commercial product that happened to come at the right time and place, rather than being something artistically groundbreaking. Stupid rock journalists and revisionists have later turned them into something they never were.

For most of their career, the Beatles were four mediocre musicians who sang melodic three-minute tunes at a time when rock music was trying to push itself beyond that format, one originally confined by the technical limitations of the 78 rpm record. They were the quintessence of "mainstream" (assimilating the innovations proposed by rock music) within the format of the melodic song.

The Beatles belonged, like the Beach Boys (whom they emulated throughout most of their career), to the era of the vocal band. In such a band the technique of the instrument was not as important as that of the chorus. Undoubtedly skilled at composing choruses, they availed themselves of producer George Martin (head of Parlophone since 1956), to embellish those choruses with arrangements more and more eccentric.

Thanks to a careful marketing campaign, they became the most celebrated entertainers of the era, and are still the darlings of magazines and tabloids, much like Princess Grace of Monaco and Lady Di
Click to expand...
 
G

Guest

Guest
Speech makes you a racist said:
I know it's circulating a lot, but for good reason. There's lots of good points about how they were just a commercial product that happened to come at the right time and place, rather than being something artistically groundbreaking. Stupid rock journalists and revisionists have later turned them into something they never were.
Click to expand...
This is a faggot and retarded take and the only reason to espouse it is to be a Tomlinson (get attention).
 
Not bad

Not bad

‎
‎
Forum Clout
19,954
Besides, there's nothing more hipstery than liking The Beatles and all their quirky shenanigans. They wrote simplistic verse-chorus pop jingles of the time and sprinkled in some novel esoteric hippie elements to give the illusion of depth, sophistication and 'spirituality'. It's fawking nonsense.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top