• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, or have other on-site inquiries, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter or @BlackQueerLivesMatter.

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    For DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Satisfying dissection of shitty scam artists The Beatles

Forum Clout
20,727
G

guest

Guest
"I love the Kinks, weeeee"

tye3sd6w7it51.jpg
 
Forum Clout
20,727
Scaruffi's Beatles article is a popular meme/pasta.

I know it's circulating a lot, but for good reason. There's lots of good points about how they were just a commercial product that happened to come at the right time and place, rather than being something artistically groundbreaking. Stupid rock journalists and revisionists have later turned them into something they never were.

For most of their career, the Beatles were four mediocre musicians who sang melodic three-minute tunes at a time when rock music was trying to push itself beyond that format, one originally confined by the technical limitations of the 78 rpm record. They were the quintessence of "mainstream" (assimilating the innovations proposed by rock music) within the format of the melodic song.

The Beatles belonged, like the Beach Boys (whom they emulated throughout most of their career), to the era of the vocal band. In such a band the technique of the instrument was not as important as that of the chorus. Undoubtedly skilled at composing choruses, they availed themselves of producer George Martin (head of Parlophone since 1956), to embellish those choruses with arrangements more and more eccentric.

Thanks to a careful marketing campaign, they became the most celebrated entertainers of the era, and are still the darlings of magazines and tabloids, much like Princess Grace of Monaco and Lady Di
 
G

Guest

Guest
I know it's circulating a lot, but for good reason. There's lots of good points about how they were just a commercial product that happened to come at the right time and place, rather than being something artistically groundbreaking. Stupid rock journalists and revisionists have later turned them into something they never were.
This is a faggot and retarded take and the only reason to espouse it is to be a Tomlinson (get attention).
 
Top