- Forum Clout
- 50,131
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
Not sure what you mean. Can't a judge hold people in contempt (aka put them in jail) for almost anything? Granted, I'm sure it won't look good if it goes to appellate courtYeah that contempt charge isn't going to hold up, what a dumb judge.
You are a stupid zoomer retard, please shut up.Uh oh contrarian (nuanced) view incoming
The judge has every right to question a lawyer on how they obtained that information. Yes, according to what Thugs lawyer cited, the private meeting was probably unlawful. HOWEVER, as the judge says, if it IS unlawful an appellate court can work that out…OR you could just say where you got the information (but the reason you won’t is because you’re doing some really unethical shit that could get you hit by the bar.)
Dudes an actual idiot because there were presumably ways to work this out and potentially get this case overturned without getting arrested. From what i’ve seen of it despite being a RICO charge against a literal gang the prosecution has been fucking up and making terrible arguments and the judge has “been on the defenses side” for a while.
I feel like you’ve said you have a construction job. If true I can imagine you in the portable shit posting after men tell you that you’re a fag.Uh oh contrarian (nuanced) view incoming
The judge has every right to question a lawyer on how they obtained that information. Yes, according to what Thugs lawyer cited, the private meeting was probably unlawful. HOWEVER, as the judge says, if it IS unlawful an appellate court can work that out…OR you could just say where you got the information (but the reason you won’t is because you’re doing some really unethical shit that could get you hit by the bar.)
Dudes an actual idiot because there were presumably ways to work this out and potentially get this case overturned without getting arrested. From what i’ve seen of it despite being a RICO charge against a literal gang the prosecution has been fucking up and making terrible arguments and the judge has “been on the defenses side” for a while.
Hey Mr sue can you approve my 60 hours of overtime! ThanksI feel like you’ve said you have a construction job. If true I can imagine you in the portable shit posting after men tell you that you’re a fag.
after this thread and the other about a nigger surgeon rapping while cutting people open, can we just nuke atlanta
what a zoo
I would never use a portable.I feel like you’ve said you have a construction job. If true I can imagine you in the portable shit posting after men tell you that you’re a fag.
I meant the shitty office that they randomly place at a job site.I would never use a portable.
Look, but don't touch!We’re in the thread for a stupid autotune rapper. This is exactly where I belong.
Thats what I meant, sorry. Am retarded. He's going to appeal it and get the judge in some shit.Not sure what you mean. Can't a judge hold people in contempt (aka put them in jail) for almost anything? Granted, I'm sure it won't look good if it goes to appellate court
Please post nigger surgeon rapafter this thread and the other about a nigger surgeon rapping while cutting people open, can we just nuke atlanta
what a zoo
In a just world the judge would have to answer for why he broke the law first but then we are where we are and I am retardedUh oh contrarian (nuanced) view incoming
The judge has every right to question a lawyer on how they obtained that information. Yes, according to what Thugs lawyer cited, the private meeting was probably unlawful. HOWEVER, as the judge says, if it IS unlawful an appellate court can work that out…OR you could just say where you got the information (but the reason you won’t is because you’re doing some really unethical shit that could get you hit by the bar.)
Dudes an actual idiot because there were presumably ways to work this out and potentially get this case overturned without getting arrested. From what i’ve seen of it despite being a RICO charge against a literal gang the prosecution has been fucking up and making terrible arguments and the judge has “been on the defenses side” for a while.
Pucture of Sue and a colleague.I feel like you’ve said you have a construction job. If true I can imagine you in the portable shit posting after men tell you that you’re a fag.
Man, that attorney is going to make so much money for not tattling on his source. Gtfo if you think he fucked upUh oh contrarian (nuanced) view incoming
The judge has every right to question a lawyer on how they obtained that information. Yes, according to what Thugs lawyer cited, the private meeting was probably unlawful. HOWEVER, as the judge says, if it IS unlawful an appellate court can work that out…OR you could just say where you got the information (but the reason you won’t is because you’re doing some really unethical shit that could get you hit by the bar.)
Dudes an actual idiot because there were presumably ways to work this out and potentially get this case overturned without getting arrested.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/