• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Question about Pat's hilariously stupid Tiny Tim book

TorquieTwoBeers

Forum Clout
25,084
So normal authors come up with an idea, then write a book about it, then release that book to the public. Pat needs his dopamine hits, so he blabs the book to the whole world before he's written a word and continually updates everyone each step of the way.

This might be a very dumb question, but what's to stop someone--like, say, noted author Owen A. Forms--from slamming out a book in three weeks where Tiny Tim, Oliver Twist, and David Copperfield go on a revenge spree, then self-publishing and copyrighting that book? Would Pat have to stop writing his dumb book or risk litigation for copyright infringement? Owen's book would already be on the market, months ahead of Pat's.

Would publishers therefore not be interested in putting out Pat's copycat book because they'd be afraid of being open to liability (in a theoretical world where any of them would have any interest to begin with)? What publisher would put out a book whose premise is identical to one that is already out?
 
G

guest

Guest
His atrocious writing aside he made a basic error with the time his story is set. Not to mention the conflicting timelines and geographical settings of the different Dickens characters he's bastardising. Obviously he's never read any of the books he's stealing from but he could at least fucking google a few Wikipedia pages. Although maybe that's too much to ask of a fatty who was happy to blab to a guy pretending to be a journalist for months before looking him up.
 

CuntFucker .

Block and report the imposter
Forum Clout
23,730
1644079599265.png
 
Top