I HATE CovidCumia's atrocious writing, and absolutely refuse to read his posts

[CuntFucker]

The poor syntax; the lack of grammar. Every post is like trying to decipher a hieroglyph made by a retarded Egyptian.

Notable mentions:

@NikkisCrustyGusset
@NigSam

...and many more who need to re-take basic English lessons.

 

[Conehead Nigger]

Shut up faggot.

 

[JewishNigger]

Every post is like trying to decipher a hieroglyph made by a retarded Egyptian.

 

[guest]

The poor syntax; the lack of grammar. Every post is like trying to decipher a hieroglyph made by a retarded Egyptian.

Notable mentions:

@NikkisCrustyGusset
@NigSam

...and many more who need to re-take basic English lessons.

huh the listed are literally one of the more exciting reads for me...very fever dream-ish prose.

 

[ShutYourCakeHorn]

huh the listed are literally one of the more exciting reads for me...very fever dream-ish prose.

Would you call them Lynchian in style?

 

[Harry Powell]

You can’t make up the lead NPA has over you with volume buddy, come on

 

[guest]

Would you call them Lynchian in style?

fawk...when I saw the notification my mouth was watering fro some juicy fresh boomia copy-past. You got lost brothaman

 

[ShutYourCakeHorn]

fawk...when I saw the notification my mouth was watering fro some juicy fresh boomia copy-past. You got lost brothaman

Again you filthy, insane, nigger how are people taking money they paid in welfare people? You run to the welfare system by going to social workers and hospitals. Nobody who I know who took disability is a welfare scag that ever had a "social worker". That's weakness and the definition of a welfare person, but yea make this a point about me saying "I'm richer" than you. I get it you were a fake model, a society girl, mental ill, you're a hero and I'm a zero, without a social worker, welfare benefits, or a rental I live in.

 

[guest]

The poor syntax; the lack of grammar. Every post is like trying to decipher a hieroglyph made by a retarded Egyptian.

Notable mentions:

@NikkisCrustyGusset
@NigSam

...and many more who need to re-take basic English lessons.

In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.

 

[RapistWithHIV]

In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.

 

[guest]

In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to faggot write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe youIn that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.In that case maybe you shouldn't nigger have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of nigger brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.faggotIn that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.faggotIn that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people nigger complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.nigger faggot niggerIn that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.

 

[RapistWithHIV]

In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to faggot write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe youIn that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.In that case maybe you shouldn't nigger have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of nigger brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.faggotIn that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.faggotIn that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people nigger complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.nigger faggot niggerIn that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation. In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.

You don't get to boomia post, bud.

We need a boomia bot that follows you & duplicates each post then mulitplies the word count by ten & condenses it into a single paragraph.

 

[Conehead Nigger]

You can’t make up the lead NPA has over you with volume buddy, come on

Both heavyweight champions of the biggest losers here, but NPA is punching down on the mulatto.

 

[JoeCumiaDotCom]

OK street shitter, because mistyping on my digital device's tiny keyboard is worse than being an unemployed retard delivering a non sequitur that his wife is gay or having a disgusting unclipped cock that looks like an impacted, constipated, turd that you squeeze out after being forced to hold your shit for lack of street to go on for 6 hours. I didn't need shit my O2 stayed safe, I also realize that steroids aid in a quicker recovery. It's a luck of draw thing, I'm not 400 lbs, I'm a very big dude still well muscled who was very athletic, I'd crush you with a slap street shitter, that's just a fact. I remember going to the 2nd Bush inauguration, I was 34 and I was just tossing faggot protesting lefties dressed up in their masks with signs. I envision you like one of them. I shoved one of them so hard I recall him rolling like a ball while the cops laughed and said "nice" lol. I'm a specimen and my dick is way bigger than that turd you were holding.

 

[chocolatehellhole]

You didn't mention his massive lisp, have you not actually heard his voice @CuntFucker?

 

[LockedHDD__Pot]

made by a retarded Egyptian.

ironic coming from you, eh?

 

[ChildSpitTake]

In that case maybe you shouldn't have joined those independent ideas with a semicolon but rather just used the conjunction "and". Here: The poor syntax and the lack of grammar. I'd even reckon that syntax is part of grammar and since so many people complain of thel ack of brevity here it might have been better to write: The lack of grammar and poor punctuation.

Where is the grammar poor, there? After watching so many of you swing and miss on grammar policing it truly is sad. BTW a comma should have preceded the "but" in your sentence, how ironic, nigger lover.‍
‍
Hush child my vocabulary is large it's my probable dyslexia that leads to spelling errors on here and fat thumbs on phones. That's semi-serious, honestly I always did well in English even had good SAT scores though higher on math, but I'm a bad speller and worse now that all my writing is just for fucking around. I suspect it could be dyslexia but I wasn't a faggot seeking a crutch, or in the alternative I'm just stupid.‍
‍
In fairness I hit the wrong keys on the stupid phone, I don't even proof read it. Oddly it has lured him into thinking this reflects well on him. "Look at my stlakers, they can't even spell". Because sperging out for 12 hours is better than a fat thumb hitting the wrong letter lol.‍
‍
It's because I hit the wrong keys and I'm not going back to move around my cursor, plus at this point it's branded as me. The hard part is knowing that the slender fingered little men here that do girl work get upset, Karens are gonna Karen.‍

 

[NikkisCrustyGusset]

The poor syntax; the lack of grammar. Every post is like trying to decipher a hieroglyph made by a retarded Egyptian.

Notable mentions:

@NikkisCrustyGusset
@NigSam

...and many more who need to re-take basic English lessons.

Awww delighted I got a mention there from you love!

 

[Stent]

Lorem ipthhsum

 

[Brooke Shields]

Posting because I'm genuinely confused how you mess up copy/pasting something 30 times...

so he copy/pasted inside a copy/paste somehow.
also wrote nigger in the middle of a fuck-up i dont understand

There's a few more, and some of these

it doesn't make sense how this can happen even when interjecting with nigggerfaggots