• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

A summary of today's court hearing

G

guest

Guest
5120A97B-19E0-4396-8BAB-170CAF292857.png
 
G

guest

Guest
is it with or without prejudice, does it say anywhere?

It's a quash. They could file it again, but something would need to be substantially changed to even have a chance. The underlying action in Wisconsin is delayed until January but since BrinTon said if this was quashed they had nothing so it might get dismissed. Given Ashley's nonchalance, probably without prejudice.

If they had unlimited funds (which at this point who the fuck knows), they could voluntarily withdraw the complaint in Wisconsin. Refile removing John Doe 1, then subpoena again, but at that point Quasi could file another quash. He could quash in Wisconsin just for fun.

At that point they will start to run into statute of limitations in almost all states. Only a few have 3 years. Also, even if quasi had information, which he said he doesn't. He's be justified in having not having anything outside of what was given. They withdrew the case. They'd have to go through another round of 30k in lawyers fees just to impose a couple hundred of dollars in sanctions against him for not retaining the data. That would also have the same 0.001% chance anyway...
 

HotDogJoe

Professional leech since 1994. Anyone can do it.
Forum Clout
79,959
That clip from 1:02 where Ed Harris is so relieved and exhausted because Joe Cumia brought up the subreddit, gets my ribs every damn time.

If I wasn't such a lazy fuck, I would've edited those parts to make them more relevant to Patty and the hearing. Then again, Joe's "it started about a year ago" line works perfectly.
 
Top