- Forum Clout
- 78,293
- Deleted by N/A
I’m just being devils advocate but can’t SFWA argue they paid for their own lawsuit for their own interests protecting their members from fake bad reviews and Pat was just a conduit for it.
Though, it was Patrick’s case and he stood to win and he stood to lose, which he did, which is why this is occurring at all.
No , that's literally https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/abuse_of_process . They'd need to be a plaintiff
Has anyone ever been illicitly bankrolled to bring a civil case against someone, and then lost and then hidden backer was chased for the judgement since their conduit is a bum who could never pay it or start the case at all without them?
Then that very specific rare occurance, has it happened with a John Doe creditor using legal representation to claim it, with two cases and one domesticated across states to the state the debtor lives in and…. Oh what’s the point, obviously this is ground breaking faggotry in history.
You'd need to have a pretty rare confluence of events but its probably happened a few times.